So was the issue the result of poor shielding and connectors of cables inside 
the trailer or actual antenna separation?  That would do it. 

And could the SSB station be pushing the power and ALC and compression thus 
likely causing distortion and splatter?   That would do it. 

One of my major pet gripes for net control operators and contest operators is 
the fact they believe turning things up a bit with the thinking they will be 
heard a bit better    When in fact they are making their signal more difficult 
to copy.   If their station sounds good during SSB rag chew QSO's the the same 
settings should also be good for contests, Field Day, and when a net control.  
The mentality of turning things up a wee bit is just pure B. S. 

Bob, K4TAX


Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 14, 2019, at 10:52 AM, KENT TRIMBLE <k9...@socket.net> wrote:
> 
> Good morning, Bob . . .
> 
> We normally use 75-100 feet separation between dipoles aligned end-to-end, 
> and have had no problems over the years.  However, last year we were limited 
> to less than 50-feet separation and I noticed the Carrier Operated Relay 
> (COR) in my K3 was kicking on occasionally from the SSB station with which we 
> (CW) were obliged to share a trailer.
> 
> I tried a TRP-150 for the first time on the air this morning and a station in 
> Michigan detected no clicks, truncating, or other aberrations.
> 
> We'll see.
> 
> 73,
> 
> Kent  K9ZTV
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 6/14/2019 10:24 AM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote:
>> With stations running 100 watts or less and reasonable antenna separation, 
>> I've found no reason for a Receiver Input Protector. Although, it might be a 
>> good idea to circumvent a "screw up" by an operator.   I've seen some mighty 
>> strange things done by knowledgeable hams at Field Day.
>> 
>> 73
>> 
>> Bob, K4TAX
>> 
>> 
>>> On 6/14/2019 10:07 AM, KENT TRIMBLE wrote:
>>> Have any of you used Ameritron's "Receiver Input Protector" model TRP-150?  
>>> I find no reviews on eHam.
>>> 
>>> 73,
>>> 
>>> Kent  K9ZTV
>>> 
>> 
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to k9...@socket.net
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
>> https://www.avg.com
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to rmcg...@blomand.net


______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com 

Reply via email to