Thermal lag exists and likely always will.   The hysteresis is reasonably 
adequate in the present configuration. 

I find no objection to the performance of the present method of cooling. 

Bob, K4TAX


Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 2, 2019, at 9:46 AM, Don Wilhelm <donw...@embarqmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Bob,
> 
> The problem with that is the fan must continue to run for some time after the 
> return to RX so the residual heat from the TX cycle can be reduced.
> 
> 73,
> Don W3FPR
> 
>> On 10/2/2019 10:12 AM, Bob wrote:
>> Personally, I wish Elecraft offered a slightly different approach, rather
>> than a minimum fan speed setting, how about a RX minimum and TX minimum?
>> This would allow quiet operation on RX, but would anticipate a higher
>> demand for cooling on TX.
>> There is quite a bit of thermal mass and overshoot that happens in TX on
>> digital modes.  By the time the fan turns on, it tends to be running behind
>> the curve trying to catch up.  Starting the fan running as soon as the rig
>> goes into TX would help considerably and allow things to go back to quiet
>> in RX.
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to rmcg...@blomand.net 


______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com 

Reply via email to