> BRUCE WW8II <wa8...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The question is will the K4 or K4D be as good or better on receive than my 
> K3s with the
> 2.1kHz and the 200Hz filters.
> 
> Bruce WW8II


Bruce,

First, a bit of background would help since they're two different 
architectures. 

The K4/K4D are "pure" SDRs, meaning they're more agile in frequency, operating 
modes, modulation and demodulation, features in general, and extensibility. A 
lot of the flexibility of the design is in service of the built-in and external 
displays as well as remote control. The K4/K4D also have a lot more digital and 
RF I/O, satisfying the demand for a modern, integrated station. For example you 
can directly attach a keyboard, mouse, HDMI monitor, and flash storage drives 
or other USB devices.

By contrast, the K3S is a superhet, with emphasis primarily on receive close-in 
dynamic range performance rather than integration, agility, extensibility. The 
use of crystal filters is an advantage in raw performance, at the expense of 
passband flatness, available bandwidths, and group delay.

The K4HD will be a hybrid of the two: When the extra dynamic range is needed, 
you can turn on the HDR module, which is essentially two superhet 
downconverters, one for the main receiver and the other for the sub. But the 
HDR module is, in practice, rarely needed unless you have high-power 
transmitters in close proximity. Examples of this situation include 
multi-transmitter contest or DXpedition stations, those living in the shadow of 
a broadcast station, and those with very nearby ham neighbors.

With this context we can now talk about receiver performance.

- The K4/K4D are very similar to competing pure SDRs using 16 bit, wide-band 
A-to-D converters: signal handling is excellent by any measure, and there's 
plenty of headroom in all but the most heavily impacted RF environments.

- Compared to *any* pure SDR, the K3S (and a few other superhets) will have a 
few dB higher third-order intercept point. (Note that Sherwood's chart still 
shows the Flex 6700, a pure SDR, at 108 dB. He corrected this later to a much 
lower number -- see the '6700 footnotes in the far right column.)

- The K4HD will be in the same ballpark as the K3S, though we're still refining 
the design and our goal is for it to be higher. (The limitation with any 
superhet is the crystal filters, and we carefully control the quality of our 
suppliers.) 

73,
Wayne
N6KR



______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com 

Reply via email to