Personally, I only care about a pure comparison test in as controlled circumstances as possible.  Any practical test like you describe will have so many variables that it won't be useful for anything other than as an anecdote.  "Ground" is going to be wildly different depending upon location.  Propagation is highly variable for distant reports, and if you instead use a nearby setup for reception, it will make a difference which direction is it relative to the trailing counterpoise.

Besides, lots of people have already proven they can make contacts with the scenario you describe, but nobody has a clue how efficient that might be or not be.

73,
Dave   AB7E



On 9/25/2022 12:30 PM, Julia Tuttle wrote:
Hi Dave,

I think that's a proper comparison in a physics sense, but I don't think it fully represents how the AX1 is deployed in practice.

I would run both an ideal scenario -- the one you described -- amd a practical scenario -- something like a KX3 + internal batteries on a picnic table, AX1 on the bipod, and the counterpoise trailing down to and across the ground.

73,

Julie

On Sun, Sep 25, 2022, 15:19 David Gilbert <[email protected]> wrote:


    To be a proper comparison, the AX1 needs to be out it the clear away
    from anything else, preferable at a height that allows the
    counterpoise
    to be hanging straight down with the end maybe a foot or two off the
    ground.  Measurements should be with the AX1 at the same height above
    the ground without and without the counterpoise. Ideally a KX2 or
    similar rig should used, be battery powered (with very short leads if
    external), no coax, and no body contact to the source of RF.  Signal
    reports should be in microvolts ... the number of contacts isn't
    really
    useful and neither is SNR if the readings are taken over a lengthy
    period of time.

    If I can get my hands on an AX1, I plan to either climb a tree or
    set up
    a tall fiberglass step ladder for the AX1 as far away line of
    sight from
    my home as practical.  I'd use my KX2 for the signal source, using
    the
    Tune function to put out RF without touching the KX2. Near my home
    I'd
    set up the portable vertical antenna I described in an earlier
    post, and
    feed that to my K3 set to read microvolts.  I'd operate the AX1 (with
    and without counterpoise wire) and any other antenna for
    comparison, and
    have a friend record the microvolts from the K3 as a blind test.

    I would use the tuner in the KX2 to simulate actual use, but that
    would
    of course introduce a variable for possibly different amounts of
    loss in
    the tuner depending upon the load.  I don't see a good way to
    avoid that.

    73,
    Dave   AB7E



    On 9/25/2022 7:06 AM, Ron Gruner wrote:
    > I've just run two tests of my WSPR/AX-1 set-up with and without a
    > counterpoise. Each test ran 24 hours over the last couple of
    days. Here are
    > the results:
    >
    > COUNTERPOISE?
    >                                YES       NO
    >                            -------  -------
    > Total Contacts                152      129
    > Maximum Distance (km)      15,720   17,276
    > Median Distance             2,137    1,823
    > Median SpotQ                  446      398
    >
    > Where SpotQ = Kilometers / [(2 Watts x (SNR in DB + 36))/36) ]
    >
    > The WSPR circuit's ground and SMA connectors are apparently
    providing
    > enough of a counterpoise to propagate a respectable signal.
    >
    > Here's a close-up of the rig with no counterpoise:
    > https://gruner.com/k4rhg/wspr_ax-1_nocounterpoise.png
    >
    > 73,
    > Ron Gruner
    > K4RHG
    > ______________________________________________________________
    > Elecraft mailing list
    > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
    > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
    > Post: mailto:[email protected]
    >
    > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
    > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
    > Message delivered to [email protected]

    ______________________________________________________________
    Elecraft mailing list
    Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
    Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
    Post: mailto:[email protected]

    This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
    Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected] 

Reply via email to