You're right, Dave.
I have three of them.
Very handy little beasts.
73, Bob N6WG

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Yarnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Tellefsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Brian Lloyd"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "elecraft Reflector"
<elecraft@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Bal[un] (was: Buddipole vs. tuner and wire)


> The BL2 (switchable balun) will handle 250 watts!  That should be
enough.
>
> Dave W7AQK
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Robert Tellefsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Brian Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "elecraft Reflector"
> <elecraft@mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 9:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Bal[un] (was: Buddipole vs. tuner and wire)
>
>
> > Hi Brian
> > I don't recall if you mentioned what power level you
> > would be using with your K2.  If it is running barefoot,
> > without the 100w PA, you could use one of the Elecraft
> > switchable baluns.  They switch between 1:1 and 4:1
> > ratios, giving you a good chance to match most balanced
> > feeds.
> >
> > Even though the rig end of the line may be reactive, due
> > to impedance mismatches along the line, the switchable
> > balun can be used to reduce the amount of mismatch the
> > ATU then has to to cope with.
> >
> > This makes a simple dipole with tuned feeders a nice
> > multiband antenna.  On a given band, try both switch
> > positions and see which one helps the ATU make the best
> > match.
> >
> > Good luck and 73
> > Bob N6WG
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Brian Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "elecraft Reflector" <elecraft@mailman.qth.net>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 8:37 AM
> > Subject: [Elecraft] Bal[un] (was: Buddipole vs. tuner and wire)
> >
> >
> >> OK, I am convinced - keep the tuner and the wire. So, that brings
up
> > a
> >> second question: balanced vs. unbalanced.
> >>
> >> Wire antennas that do not require a counterpoise are usually
loops
> > or
> >> dipoles, i.e. inherently balanced even if not resonant. Most
tuners
> >> offer an unbalanced output. SGC says, just connect up the
antenna.
> >> Seems to me that a balun would improve things and keep RF off the
> > coax
> >> and power leads to the tuner. But how well do baluns handle huge
> >> mismatch?
> >>
> >> Just off the top of my head, it seems to me that the tuner at the
> > top
> >> of a pole with two legs sloped down, i.e. inverted-V, would make
a
> >> pretty good omni all-band antenna.
> >>
> >> More thinking aloud.
> >>
> >> Brian Lloyd
> >> Granite Bay Montessori School          9330 Sierra College Bl
> >> brian AT gbmontessori DOT com          Roseville, CA 95661
> >> +1.916.367.2131 (voice)                +1.791.912.8170 (fax)
> >>
> >> PGP key ID:          12095C52A32A1B6C
> >> PGP key fingerprint: 3B1D BA11 4913 3254 B6E0  CC09 1209 5C52
A32A
> > 1B6C
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Elecraft mailing list
> >> Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> >> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> >> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
> >>  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> >>
> >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> >> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Elecraft mailing list
> > Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> > You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> >
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
> >
>

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft    

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply via email to