Thanks, Don for your thoughts.
I am familiar with the relationship between sound card sampling frequency
and achievable spectrum width, and also with the SoftRock Yahoo group,
athough it has been a while since I have been there. Sound card choice is
complicated by the fact that the K3 invites portable operation; if I take a
sound card dependent approach, I would want it to work with both desktop and
laptop (as the non-soundcard solutions already do). The desktop currently
has a Sound Blaster XFi Xtreme Audio, with 24 bit sampling at 96 kHz. This
may be good enough for me for use at home. I have no spec's for the laptop's
built-in sound card, but suspect it won't sample above 48 kHz. I know that
it is susceptible to hash on the audio input when operated with its mains
power supply operated from a power inverter in the field. A PCMCIA card
might upgrade the laptop to be on par with the desktop without an extra box,
but it seems the PCMCIA standard is considered obsolete. I found a PCMCIA
audio card with good specs that has been recommended on the SoftRock group.
That card is available used. However, I found a web site that states that it
won't work with one of the chips in my laptop (and a lot of other laptops).
The Soundblaster Live is a new one to me. There seems to exist an outboard
box version of it, which may be attractive for the laptop (except an
external box is per se unattractive). Whether I add an external or PCMCIA
card, it seems that I would have to plunk down the money first and then find
out if it is any better than the laptop's built-in audio w.r.t. the power
supply hash. Maybe I should just build a filter for the laptop power supply
first. On the other hand the SDR's that don't need any sound card would
avoid that whole hassle (assuming they don't have a problem working with
laptop with some hash on the DC supply).
It is one thing to choose one path to achieve a single goal. It is another
thing to plan for multiple goals. I would like to be able to have the
spectral display run simultaneously with digital mode software. "Why do you
want that", someone objects, "when you already have the waterfall in the
digital mode software?" I know that, unless operating conditions are very
benign, I get better digital copy with a narrow filter setting that means no
other signals than the currently worked station is visible on the waterfall.
The panoramic display should still be functional under those conditions. I
know many people love the panoramic aspect of digital mode software because
it offers so much for so little, but that very fact tends to lead to
distorted priorities (I am sticking out my neck here!) such as "everyone has
to run low power and be close to everyone's noise level, so that noone's agc
affects the noone's wanted signal". No such need once people have real
panoramic reception with the corresponding frequency resolution (and click
to tune), and then IF filters can be kept narrow all the time. (This is also
a virtue of the K3's built-in PSK and RTTY encode/decode, although I don't
find it useful until PC software supports it so that one can send from the
keyboard and see more than a few received characters.)
OK I just went off on a tangent. Now back to the subject. An external
soundcard in combination with the laptop's built-in audio would let me
operate both digital and panadapter at the same time, albeit at least one of
the two would have substandard audio with power hash problems. Suppose the
external soundcard fixes the power hash problem. (I think this to be likely;
after all the makers of these high performance audio solutions probably
wouldn't want user complaints due to DC supply hash.) Then I'd want two
external sound cards if one is needed for panoramic reception. It might be
more prudent to spread the technology evolution risks by only getting one of
these, plus an SDR that doesn't need a sound card. Ultimately though, I
believe that today's hardware seldom breaks, but is very often made obsolete
by changes in software. (That is one reason I am happy that my radio is able
to function without a computer!). In the absence of software-free panoramic
adapters for the K3, we obviously have to accept using computer software.
Digital modes also require the computer with only a few minor exceptions.
For contest use we may require the computer for logging. Then we have
several pieces of software sharing one display (at least in portable
operation, multiple monitors may be impractical; I do have two monitors on
my home computer next to the radios). If each program displays a large and
complex window, it is going to be hard to place the windows so that they
don't interfere with one another. Thus I am back to the following order of
priorities: 1. What are the characteristics of the candidate software
packages, and 2. What hardware is supported by the best software
combination.
73,
Erik K7TV
----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Wilhelm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "K7TV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 panadapter choices
Eric,
The expensive soundcard is not required to use the K3 IF output
effectively. Yes, the better soundcards will allow you to display 192 kHz
of the band centered on the K3 frequency, but how often is that needed?
If you can answer "rarely or never", then you can use one of the lesser
capability soundcards to display 80 kHz or so. The Soundblaster Live card
is still available at a reasonable price and has a 24 bit ADC with a
reasonable noise floor, so the dynamic range should be adequate.
The real answer depends on your wants and needs - if you want to display
the maximum slice of the spectrum, then go with the best available, but if
your budget must be minded, then there are other alternatives.
Actually, any soundcard will work - the question is just how much dynamic
range will you have and how wide a swath of the spectrum will you be able
to display. You may want to look at the Softrock reflector (a Yahoo
group) for additional information - but there are a lot of advocates there
who strive for the best of the best.
73,
Don W3FPR
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
