I doubt that a receive-only K3 would cost significantly less than a K3/10. Unless there are licensing issues in a particular country, an SWL could buy a K3/10 with a sub-receiver and enjoy full diversity reception today. Just be careful not to transmit.
/Rick N6XI On 3/9/10, Dave Rickmers <[email protected]> wrote: > > A version minus the 12 Watt exciter would be very easy to implement, > would it not? The SWL BCBDXer community is interested. The DSP > synchronous detector will be a major attraction for shortwave listeners. > > -- Rick Tavan N6XI Truckee, CA ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
