If I were looking for a little "receive only" thingie, I would buy a Perseus or something similar. Or an R-390, but I realize there's the risk of spinal injury with something that hefty. I have one, so I don't need another "receive only" thing, although back surgery is something I might consider if I ever have to move it from the operating table :-)
Grant/NQ5T On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Rick Tavan N6XI wrote: > I doubt that a receive-only K3 would cost significantly less than a K3/10. > Unless there are licensing issues in a particular country, an SWL could buy > a K3/10 with a sub-receiver and enjoy full diversity reception today. Just > be careful not to transmit. > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
