lstavenhagen wrote: > > Actually, the K3/10 is far less expensive than its nearest competitors as > far as RX performance from what I can see. >
I disagree. Perseus is $1199 in the US and is the current hot ticket for SWLers. Why? Because it can receive the entire MW band for recording and analysis later. RX performance is comparable to a K3 (maybe better) and Perseus can receive the entire 10 kHz - 30 MHz range as is (the K3 cannot). http://www.ssbusa.com/perseus.html 73, Bill -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Any-Consideration-of-a-Receive-Only-K3-tp4704530p4711541.html Sent from the [K3] mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
