Hi everyone, From my past experience with K3, I felt the stock 2.7Khz filter was not bad at all. Therefore, I quite agree to that proposal of equipping an additional narrow filter instead of replacing the 2.7Khz filter with 2.8khz filter.
73 Johnny VR2XMC ----- 郵件原件 ---- 寄件人﹕ "David Ferrington, M0XDF" <[email protected]> 收件人﹕ Bill VanAlstyne W5WVO <[email protected]> 副本(CC) [email protected] 傳送日期﹕ 2010/4/12 (一) 8:30:11 PM 主題： Re: [Elecraft] 2.7 vs 2.8 Yes, I'll second that, the 1.8 filter does a good job on SSB, not sure how good the DSP alone would be because I've never tried it, but starting with a 'normal' 2.8 bandwidth and gradually reducing it down until is 1.8 does help a lot. I have the second preset on the filter set up for that. BTW, don't use width and shift to get to the 1.8, use Hi/Lo cut and bring the lo point up a bit and the hi down the most - seems easier to get a good setting that way. 73 de M0XDF, K3 #174 -- The soul is the same in all living creatures, although the body is different. -Hippocrates, physician (460-c.377 BCE) On 12 Apr 2010, at 13:23, Bill VanAlstyne W5WVO wrote: > I already have the 8-pole 1.8 kHz filter installed for narrow SSB work, > however, which works great in crowded bands. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
