Before you plunge have you seen that there are 1.5's available? ~Brett
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 14:56 -0500, Bill K9YEQ wrote: > Skip my question.... should have read the archives first. I have my > answer... 1.8 for me. > > Bill > K9YEQ > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill K9YEQ > Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 2:47 PM > To: 'David Ferrington, M0XDF'; 'Bob Garceau' > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 2.7 vs 2.8 vs 1.8 & 2.1 > > I am using a pair of 8 pole 2.8 and am very happy. There is at times tons > of qrm on 75 meters in the evening. Question: Is anyone using the 2.8 and > 2.1/1.8 filters and what is the on-the-air experience? > > Bill > K9YEQ > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Ferrington, > M0XDF > Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 7:06 AM > To: Bob Garceau > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 2.7 vs 2.8 > > Since you seem to favour 8 pole, I'd say do it. You should be able to get a > rebate on the 2.8kHz against the 2.7kHz. > Also, if you are going to get the KRX3, it's simple to align the 8 pole > filters - otherwise you need to tell Elecraft what the offset of your 2.7kHz > is ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
