I didn't say in all this not to get a narrower filter too - I think Bob said he was buying other filters too. 73 de M0XDF, K3 #174 -- Don‘t complain. Nobody will understand. Or care. And certainly don‘t try to fix the situation yourself. It‘s dangerous. Leave it to a highly untrained, unqualified, expendable professional.
On 12 Apr 2010, at 15:56, lstavenhagen wrote: > > I also vote no on the 2.8 8 pole and instead investing in a seperate narrower > 8 pole. SSB is always like trying to hold a conversation in a drunken bar > during Mardi Gras anyway (the main reason I've never used voice modes in my > amateur career), so you need something really stiff at narrower setting if > you want to block heavy QRM. > > The DSP does a pretty good job but adding in the crystal filter makes it > absolutely like a brick wall. I have the 5 pole 2.7 and the 8 pole 400hz. > The difference between say 450hz with the DSP and 400 with the filter also > engaged is pretty dramatic when the sigs are really strong. Nothing outside > that filter can get through, but with just the DSP, you can start to get > artifacts from sigs that are still within the 2.7khz filter passband. > > I'm probably going to get the 250hz 8 pole as well for CW and PSK as a > result hi hi... ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
