I had joined the LWV a few years ago, but when I found out that they
blatantly oppose the First Amendment I dumped them ASAP. What else can
you call a prohibition on "issue-advocacy" ads within 60 days before a
general election? And what part of "Congress shall pass no law ..."
don't they understand?
Their stance on voting methods doesn't surprise me a bit.
--Russ
Markus Schulze markus.schulze-at-alumni.tu-berlin.de |EMlist| wrote:
Hallo,
the final report on the voting systems study of the
League of Women Voters of Minnesota has been published:
http://www.lwvmn.org/LocalLeagues/BLA/league.html
http://lwvnorthfieldmn.org/blogs/homepageblog/archives/Maycat.pdf
It says: "LWVMN supports the option to use Instant Runoff Voting
to elect State or Local Officials in single seat elections. LWVMN
also supports the continued use of the plurality voting system in
our elections. (...) LWVMN does not support Approval, Borda Count,
or Condorcet as alternative voting systems."
Markus Schulze
----
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
----
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
