election-methods-electorama.com  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [EM] least additional votes Juho Laatu
• [EM] About random election methods Andrew Myers
  • Re: [EM] About random election methods Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] About random election methods Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] About random election methods Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] About random election methods Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] About random election methods Forest Simmons
• [EM] Automatic gerrymandering Michael A. Rouse
• Re: [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling Kevin Venzke
  • [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling Ted Stern
• [EM] Approval Voting & Spoiler Effect Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: least additional votes method (was "first wave Condocet versions...") Juho Laatu
• [EM] Russ, 14 March, '05, 0700 GMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: first wave Condorcet methods for public elections MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Re: first wave Condorcet methods for public elections James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Markus, 14 March, '05, 0510 GMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Markus, 14 March, '05, 0510 GMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Markus, 14 March, '05, 0510 GMT Markus Schulze
• [EM] Ranked Approval Voting (RAV) Russ Paielli
  • [EM] Re: Ranked Approval Voting (RAV) Ted Stern
  • [EM] Ranked Approval Voting (RAV) Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Ranked Approval Voting (RAV) Russ Paielli
  • [EM] Ranked Approval Voting (RAV) Chris Benham
• [EM] Round Robins Alex Small
  • RE: [EM] Round Robins Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] Round Robins Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] Round Robins Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Round Robins Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] Round Robins Dave Ketchum
  • RE: [EM] Round Robins Dave Ketchum
  • RE: [EM] Round Robins Paul Kislanko
  • RE: [EM] Round Robins Alex Small
  • RE: [EM] Round Robins Paul Kislanko
  • [EM] Round Robins pass 2 Dave Ketchum
  • RE: [EM] Round Robins Gervase Lam
• [EM] Condorcet should be called Instant Round Robin (IRR) Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election Fan de Condorcet
  • Re: [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election Fan de Condorcet
  • Re: [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election James Green-Armytage
  • [EM] "margins" Condorcet methods have a critical strategy problem James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] "margins" Condorcet methods have a critical strategy problem Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] first-wave Condorcet versions for public election Juho Laatu
  • [EM] least additional votes method (was "first wave Condocet versions...") James Green-Armytage
  • [EM] majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy James Green-Armytage
  • [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy James Green-Armytage
  • [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy James Green-Armytage
  • [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy James Green-Armytage
  • [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy James Green-Armytage
  • [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy Stephane Rouillon
  • RE: [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy James Gilmour
  • RE: [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • RE: [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy Stephane Rouillon
  • Re: [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy Stephane Rouillon
  • RE: [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy Abd ulRahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy Juho Laatu
  • [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy James Green-Armytage
  • [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy Juho Laatu
• [EM] sequential dropping James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] sequential dropping Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] sequential dropping James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] sequential dropping Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] sequential dropping James Green-Armytage
  • [EM] correction James Green-Armytage
  • [EM] sequential dropping Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] sequential dropping Markus Schulze
  • [EM] sequential dropping Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] sequential dropping Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] sequential dropping James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] sequential dropping Markus Schulze
• Re: [Fwd: [EM] Approval/Condorcet] Russ Paielli
• [EM] Yes, the Approval loser can be the CW. Forest Simmons
• [EM] Why IRV is popular Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] Why IRV is popular James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] Why IRV is popular Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] Why IRV is popular Alex Small
  • [EM] Why Condorcet should be more popular than IRV (was: Why IRV is popular) Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Why IRV is popular RLSuter
  • Re: [EM] Why IRV is popular Eric Gorr
  • [EM] Condorcet should be called Instant Round Robin (IRR) Jan Kok
  • RE: [EM] Condorcet should be called Instant Round Robin (IRR) Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Re: Approval cutoff AKA "None of the Below" Jobst Heitzig
  • [EM] Re: Approval cutoff AKA "None of the Below" Ted Stern
• [EM] Ramon Llull method = ? James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] Ramon Llull method = ? Markus Schulze
  • [EM] Ramon Llull method = ? Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Russ, 12 March, '05, 0645 GMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, 12 Mfarch, '05, 0315 GMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Markus, 12 Mfarch, '05, 0315 GMT Markus Schulze
• [EM] Approval/Condorcet Forest Simmons
• [EM] Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling Forest Simmons
  • [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling Jobst Heitzig
  • [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling Ted Stern
  • [EM] Ted's Total Approval Beatpath Forest Simmons
  • [EM] Total Approval Ranked Pairs (Was "Re: Ted's Total Approval Beatpath") Ted Stern
  • [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs (Was "Re: Ted's Total Approval Beatpath") Forest Simmons
  • [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs Ted Stern
  • [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs Forest Simmons
  • [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs Jobst Heitzig
  • [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs Ted Stern
  • [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs Ted Stern
  • [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs Russ Paielli
  • [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs Ted Stern
  • Re: [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs Eric Gorr
  • [EM] Re: Total Approval Ranked Pairs Russ Paielli
  • [EM] a name for random ballot from P Forest Simmons
  • [EM] Re: a name for random ballot from P Jobst Heitzig
  • [EM] Re: a name for random ballot from P Forest Simmons
  • [EM] Re: a name for random ballot from P Monkey Puzzle
  • [EM] Re: a name for random ballot from P Forest Simmons
  • [EM] Full Majority as Part of Strong Defeat Forest Simmons
  • [EM] visualizing the procedure for RAV (or whatever you call it) Russ Paielli
  • [EM] Re: visualizing the procedure for RAV (or whatever you call it) Ted Stern
  • Re: [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling Russ Paielli
  • [EM] Approval/Condorcet Compromise Forest Simmons
  • [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling Jobst Heitzig
  • [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] Re: Chain Climbing --> Chain Filling Russ Paielli
• [EM] Markus, 11 March, 0240 GMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Markus, 11 March, 0240 GMT Markus Schulze
• [EM] Re: What respected IRVists are saying about Condorcet, Approval, etc. Ted Stern
  • Re: [EM] Re: What respected IRVists are saying about Condorcet, Approval, etc. Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] Re: What respected IRVists are saying about Condorcet, Approval, etc James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] Re: What respected IRVists are saying about Condorcet, Approval, etc Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] Re: What respected IRVists are saying about Condorcet, Approval, etc. Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: Approval/Condorcet Compromise Chris Benham
• [EM] San Francisco IRV Raw Ballot Data Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] San Francisco IRV Raw Ballot Data bql
  • Re: [EM] San Francisco IRV Raw Ballot Data Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] San Francisco IRV Raw Ballot Data Daniel Bishop
  • Re: [EM] San Francisco IRV Raw Ballot Data Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] San Francisco IRV Raw Ballot Data Daniel Bishop
  • [EM] San Francisco IRV Ballots - District 9 Eric Gorr
• [EM] Approval/Condorcet Compromise Forest Simmons
  • [EM] Re: Approval/Condorcet Compromise Ted Stern
  • Re: [EM] Re: Approval/Condorcet Compromise Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] Approval/Condorcet Compromise Gervase Lam
• [EM] Re: is the Raynaud method Smith-efficient Forest Simmons
• [EM] IRV Failures Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] IRV Failures Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] IRV Failures Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] IRV Failures Bart Ingles
• [EM] is the Raynaud method Smith-efficient? James Green-Armytage
  • [EM] is the Raynaud method Smith-efficient? Chris Benham
• [EM] publicly acceptable election methods Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] publicly acceptable election methods James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] publicly acceptable election methods Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] publicly acceptable election methods James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] publicly acceptable election methods Dave Ketchum
  • [EM] IRV Failures Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] IRV Failures James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] IRV Failures Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] IRV Failures Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] IRV Failures Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] IRV Failures Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] IRV Failures Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] IRV Failures Daniel Bishop
  • Re: [EM] IRV Failures Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] IRV Failures Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] IRV Failures Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] IRV Failures Diana Galletly
• [EM] Methods that apply to more than MinMax :-) MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Later no harm, Condorcet, and randomization Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] Later no harm, Condorcet, and randomization Kevin Venzke
  • [EM] Later no harm, Condorcet, and randomization Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] Later no harm, Condorcet, and randomization Kevin Venzke
  • [EM] Later no harm, Condorcet, and randomization Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] Later no harm, Condorcet, and randomization Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Equal-ranking in Condorcet, SCRIRVE (was" Condorcet-Approval hybrid method") Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Equal-ranking in Condorcet, SCRIRVE (was" Condorcet-Approval hybrid method") Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Equal Rankings in Real World Voting Systems Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Equal Rankings in Real World Voting Systems Gervase Lam
• [EM] Markus, "majority-rejected", and some Markus opinions MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Markus, "majority-rejected", and some Markus opinions Markus Schulze
• [EM] Russ, SFC, and wv vs margins MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] I have to rescind my method (a better one exists) Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Cardinal Pairwise Steven Barney
  • Re: [EM] Re: Cardinal Pairwise James Green-Armytage
• Re: [EM] "margins vs. winning votes" and Woodall's "Plurality" criterion Markus Schulze
• [EM] FBC and several favorites MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Briefer demonstration for Better-Than-Expectation MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] "margins vs. winning votes" and Woodall's "Plurality" criterion Chris Benham
  • [EM] Ballot integrity (Was 'Re: "margins vs. winning votes" and Woodall's "Plurality" criterion') Ted Stern
  • Re: [EM] Ballot integrity (Was 'Re: "margins vs. winning votes" and Woodall's "Plurality" criterion') Dave Ketchum
• [EM] my last post: a clarification James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: chain climbing methods Forest Simmons
  • [EM] Re: chain climbing methods Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] Re: chain climbing methods Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Re: chain climbing methods Forest Simmons

• Earlier messages
• Later messages