election-methods-list  

Messages by Date

• 2003/01/31 RE: [EM] To Marquette, to Marquette ... Narins, Josh
• 2003/01/31 [EM] "population paradox" using largest remainder with small # of voters? Adam Tarr
• 2003/01/30 Re: [EM] To Marquette, to Marquette ... Dave Ketchum
• 2003/01/30 Re: [EM] To Marquette, to Marquette ... Alex Small
• 2003/01/30 Re: [EM] Strong FBC, at last Alex Small
• 2003/01/30 Re: [EM] To Marquette, to Marquette ... Dave Ketchum
• 2003/01/30 Re: [EM] Strong FBC, at last Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/30 Re: [EM] Strong FBC, at last Alex Small
• 2003/01/30 Re: [EM] Strong FBC, at last Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/29 Re: [EM] Strong FBC, at last-correction Alex Small
• 2003/01/29 Re: [EM] Strong FBC, at last Alex Small
• 2003/01/29 Re: [EM] Strong FBC, at last Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/29 [EM] Strong FBC, at last Alex Small
• 2003/01/29 Re: [EM] To Marquette, to Marquette ... Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/29 Re: [EM] To Marquette, to Marquette ... Alex Small
• 2003/01/29 [EM] Voting System of the World link requested Narins, Josh
• 2003/01/29 Re: [EM] To Marquette, to Marquette ... Steve Barney
• 2003/01/29 Re: [EM] To Marquette, to Marquette ... Steve Barney
• 2003/01/29 Re: [EM] To Marquette, to Marquette ... Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/28 Re: [EM] To Marquette, to Marquette ... Bart Ingles
• 2003/01/28 [EM] To Marquette, to Marquette ... Joe Weinstein
• 2003/01/28 RE: [EM] Nanson in the USA Narins, Josh
• 2003/01/28 Re: [EM] Nanson in the USA Alex Small
• 2003/01/28 Re: [EM] Nanson in the USA Steve Barney
• 2003/01/28 Re: [EM] Nanson in the USA Steve Barney
• 2003/01/28 Re: [EM] Wisconsin vs Michigan Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/27 [EM] Wisconsin vs Michigan MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2003/01/27 [EM] Any updates on Voting in Med Univ & Relig ORders? Narins, Josh
• 2003/01/27 Re: [EM] 01/17/03 - No Problem, Olli: Olli Salmi
• 2003/01/26 Re: [EM] Wisconsin or Michigan Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/26 Re: [EM] Wisconsin or Michigan Dave Ketchum
• 2003/01/25 [EM] Wisconsin or Michigan MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2003/01/24 [EM] Joe Weinstein's Approval Strategy Idea Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/23 Re: [EM] Nanson in Wisconsin or Michigan? Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/23 Re: [EM] Nanson in Wisconsin or Michigan? Sampo Syreeni
• 2003/01/23 Re: [EM] Nanson in Wisconsin or Michigan? Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/22 Re: [EM] Nanson in Wisconsin or Michigan? Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/21 RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
• 2003/01/21 [EM] Nanson in Wisconsin or Michigan? Steve Barney
• 2003/01/21 RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/21 [EM] The Swiss, Living at the Edge of Democracy Narins, Josh
• 2003/01/21 [EM] Nanson in the USA Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/21 [EM] 01/21/03 - Re: Wasted votes and quotas: Donald Davison
• 2003/01/21 [EM] Markus contd. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2003/01/20 Re: Condorcet definitions Alex Small
• 2003/01/20 [EM] Condorcet definitions MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2003/01/20 Re: [EM] Markus: What is Condorcet's method? Alex Small
• 2003/01/20 Re: [EM] Is no Clones rule but EMers that it was used? Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/19 [EM] Markus: What is Condorcet's method? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2003/01/19 RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Alex Small
• 2003/01/19 RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
• 2003/01/19 [EM] My site ericgorr
• 2003/01/19 RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Alex Small
• 2003/01/19 Re: [EM] Markus: Copeland isn't Condorcet Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/18 [EM] Steph: Extremist shouldn't change outcome? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2003/01/18 [EM] Markus: Copeland isn't Condorcet MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2003/01/18 RE: [EM] Steph: You still haven't heard my question. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2003/01/18 Re: [EM] 1-Person-1-Vote has been abandoned. Bart Ingles
• 2003/01/18 RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
• 2003/01/18 Re: [EM] 01/18/03 - Markus on Parties and Candidates in any mix: Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/18 [EM] 01/18/03 - Markus on Parties and Candidates in any mix: Donald Davison
• 2003/01/18 [EM] Steph--median & your criterion MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2003/01/17 RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/17 Re: [ESD] Single-seat cumulative voting options Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/17 Re: [ESD] Single-seat cumulative voting options Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/17 RE: [EM] 01/17/03 - No Problem, Olli: James Gilmour
• 2003/01/17 [EM] Condorcet's Words Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/17 Re: [EM] Symmetry and Condorcet Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/17 RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/17 RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Alex Small
• 2003/01/17 RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/17 RE: [EM] Steph: You still haven't heard my question. Arnie Urken
• 2003/01/17 Re: [EM] Steph: You still haven't heard my question. Stephane Rouillon
• 2003/01/17 [EM] 01/17/03 - No Problem, Olli: Donald Davison
• 2003/01/16 RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Alex Small
• 2003/01/16 RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
• 2003/01/16 Re: [EM] Symmetry and Condorcet Alex Small
• 2003/01/16 RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/16 Re: [EM] Symmetry and Condorcet Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/16 RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/16 RE: [EM] 01/12/03 - James Gilmour Writes and Writes Somemore: James Gilmour
• 2003/01/16 Re: [EM] 1-Person-1-Vote has been abandoned. Stephane Rouillon
• 2003/01/16 Re: [EM] RP & CSSD pick A,B,C,& D Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/16 Re: [EM] Symmetry and Condorcet--Correction Alex Small
• 2003/01/16 Re: [EM] Symmetry and Condorcet--Correction Alex Small
• 2003/01/16 RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
• 2003/01/16 [EM] RP & CSSD pick A,B,C,& D MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2003/01/16 [EM] Symmetry and Condorcet Alex Small
• 2003/01/16 Re: [EM] An odd case for Ranked-Pairs Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/16 [EM] 01/16/03 - Hey James, Droop Quota is an Oxymoron: Donald Davison
• 2003/01/16 [EM] Equally stongest unconsidered defeats in RP MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2003/01/15 [EM] Steph: You still haven't heard my question. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2003/01/15 Re: [ESD] Single-seat cumulative voting options Alex Small
• 2003/01/15 Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/15 Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Alex Small
• 2003/01/15 RE: [EM] 1-Person-1-Vote has been abandoned. Narins, Josh
• 2003/01/15 Re: [EM] 1-Person-1-Vote has been abandoned. Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/15 Re: [EM] 1-Person-1-Vote has been abandoned. Eric Gorr
• 2003/01/15 Re: [EM] 1-Person-1-Vote has been abandoned. Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/15 Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/15 Re: [EM] 1-Person-1-Vote has been abandoned. Eric Gorr
• 2003/01/15 Re: [EM] 1-Person-1-Vote has been abandoned. Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/15 Re: [EM] 1-Person-1-Vote has been abandoned. Adam Tarr
• 2003/01/15 Re: [EM] 1-Person-1-Vote has been abandoned. Stephane Rouillon
• 2003/01/15 Re: [EM] The RP example, winnner doesn't beat anyone. Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/15 [EM] 01/15/03 - James' reply to my `Northern Ireland Assembly' Letter: Donald Davison
• 2003/01/14 [EM] The RP example, winnner doesn't beat anyone. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2003/01/14 Re: [EM] 1-Person-1-Vote has been abandoned. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2003/01/14 Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
• 2003/01/14 Re: [EM] An odd case for Ranked-Pairs Eric Gorr
• 2003/01/14 Re: [EM] An odd case for Ranked-Pairs Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/14 Re: [EM] Tie-breaking for Ranked-Pairs and other methods Eric Gorr
• 2003/01/14 Re: [EM] An odd case for Ranked-Pairs Eric Gorr
• 2003/01/14 Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Alex Small
• 2003/01/14 Re: [EM] Is no Clones rule but EMers that it was used? Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/14 [EM] A practical matter for Ranked-Pairs, among other methods Eric Gorr
• 2003/01/14 Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/14 Re: [EM] An odd case for Ranked-Pairs Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/14 [EM] Tie-breaking for Ranked-Pairs and other methods Stephane Rouillon
• 2003/01/14 Re: [EM] 1-person-1-vote has been abandoned. Alex Small
• 2003/01/14 [EM] An odd case for Ranked-Pairs Eric Gorr
• 2003/01/14 Re: [EM] 1-person-1-vote has been abandoned. Stephane Rouillon
• 2003/01/14 Re: [EM] The voter median candidate generalized to multidimensionalissue space Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/13 [EM] 1-person-1-vote has been abandoned. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2003/01/13 [EM] Steph's Condorcet example MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2003/01/13 Re: [EM] The voter median candidate generalized to multidimensionalissue spaces. Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/13 RE: [EM] Voting site updated Eric Gorr
• 2003/01/13 [EM] surprising consequence of strong FBC Alex Small
• 2003/01/13 RE: [EM] Voting site updated Narins, Josh
• 2003/01/13 [EM] Voting site updated Eric Gorr
• 2003/01/13 [EM] 01/12/03 - James Gilmour Writes and Writes Somemore: Donald E Davison
• 2003/01/12 Re: [EM] Is no Clones rule but EMers that it was used? Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/12 Re: [EM] Markus Schulze Wrote and Wrote Again: Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/12 Re: Markus Schulze Wrote and Wrote Again: Donald Davison
• 2003/01/10 [EM] National Journal article on election reform Douglas Greene
• 2003/01/10 Re: [EM] The voter median candidate generalized to multidimensionalissue spaces. (fwd) Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/10 Re: [EM] The voter median candidate generalized to multidimensionalissue spaces. (fwd) Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/10 Re: Re: [EM] The voter median candidate generalized to multidimensionalissue spaces. Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/10 Re: Re: [EM] The voter median candidate generalized to multidimensional issue spaces. stephane . rouillon
• 2003/01/09 Re: [EM] The voter median candidate generalized to multidimensionalissue spaces. Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/09 Re: [EM] The voter median candidate generalized to multidimensionalissue spaces Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/09 Re: [EM] The voter median candidate generalized to multidimensionalissue spaces. Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/09 Re: [EM] The voter median candidate generalized to multidimensional issue spaces Eric Gorr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
• 2003/01/08 [EM] The voter median candidate generalized to multidimensional issuespaces. Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/08 RE: [EM] Advanced Math question Narins, Josh
• 2003/01/08 Re: [EM] Ties (was Condorcet Voting) Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/07 Re: Computing Results (RE: [EM] Advanced Math question) Bart Ingles
• 2003/01/07 Re: [EM] 01/05/03 - Two Replies for Olli: Olli Salmi
• 2003/01/07 Re: [EM] Ties (was Condorcet Voting) Alex Small
• 2003/01/07 Re: [EM] Ties (was Condorcet Voting) Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/07 [EM] Ties (was Condorcet Voting) Alex Small
• 2003/01/07 Re: [EM] Condorcet Voting Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/07 Re: [EM] Advanced Math question Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/07 Re: [EM] Condorcet Voting Dave Ketchum
• 2003/01/07 Re: [EM] Condorcet Voting Eric Gorr
• 2003/01/07 Re: [EM] Condorcet Voting Alex Small
• 2003/01/07 Re: [EM] Condorcet Voting Eric Gorr
• 2003/01/07 Re: [EM] Condorcet Voting Dave Ketchum
• 2003/01/07 Re: [EM] Condorcet Voting Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/07 Re: Re: [EM] Condorcet Voting ericgorr
• 2003/01/07 Re: [EM] Condorcet Voting Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/07 Re: Re: [EM] Condorcet Voting stephane . rouillon
• 2003/01/06 Re: [EM] Condorcet Voting Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/06 Re: [EM] Kemeny's Rules = Condorcet's Method Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/06 RE: [EM] 01/05/03 - Two Replies for Olli: James Gilmour
• 2003/01/06 Re: [EM] Approval with 2 ballotings Bart Ingles
• 2003/01/06 Re: [EM] Kemeny's Rules = Condorcet's Method Steve Barney
• 2003/01/06 [EM] Condorcet Voting Eric Gorr
• 2003/01/06 [EM] Condorcet Voting Eric Gorr
• 2003/01/06 Computing Results (RE: [EM] Advanced Math question) Narins, Josh
• 2003/01/06 [EM] 01/05/03 - Two Replies for Olli: Donald Davison
• 2003/01/05 Re: [EM] Dave: Primaries, runoffs Dave Ketchum
• 2003/01/05 Re: [EM] Power of votes with approval Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2003/01/05 Re: [EM] Dave: Primaries, runoffs Alex Small
• 2003/01/05 Re: [EM] Dave: Primaries, runoffs Dave Ketchum
• 2003/01/05 Re: [EM] Dave: Primaries, runoffs Dave Ketchum
• 2003/01/05 [EM] Condorcet example(s)? Cory Levenberg
• 2003/01/05 Re: [EM] Dave: Primaries, runoffs Alex Small
• 2003/01/04 [EM] The new method and the example MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2003/01/04 [EM] Dave: Primaries, runoffs MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2003/01/04 [EM] 01/05/03 - Olli Salmi and d'Hondt: Donald Davison
• 2003/01/04 Re: [EM] My Matrix for Kemeny's Rule, n=3 Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/03 Re: [EM] My Matrix for Kemeny's Rule, n=3 barnes99
• 2003/01/03 Re: [EM] Approval with 2 ballotings Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/02 Re: [EM] Approval with 2 ballotings Alex Small
• 2003/01/02 [EM] RP elects A & B in Forrest's example MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2003/01/02 Re: [EM] Advanced Math question Bart Ingles
• 2003/01/02 Re: [EM] Final Conclusion on strong FBC!!!!!! Alex Small
• 2003/01/02 Re: [EM] Final Conclusion on strong FBC!!!!!! Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/02 [EM] Approval from rankings Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/02 Re: [EM] My Matrix for Kemeny's Rule, n=3 Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/02 Re: [EM] Need IRV examples; voting show Forest Simmons
• 2003/01/02 Re: [EM] My Matrix for Kemeny's Rule, n=3 Markus Schulze
• 2003/01/02 Re: [EM] My Matrix for Kemeny's Rule, n=3 barnes99
• 2003/01/02 [EM] Final Conclusion on strong FBC!!!!!! Alex Small
• 2003/01/02 RE: [EM] Advanced Math question Narins, Josh
• 2003/01/01 Re: [EM] Advanced Math question Dave Ketchum
• 2003/01/01 Re: [EM] Approval with 2 ballotings Dave Ketchum
• 2003/01/01 [EM] Alex Small
• 2003/01/01 Re: [EM] Approval with 2 ballotings Alex Small

• Earlier messages
• Later messages