LAYTON Craig wrote: > A sincere vote in a plurality count method is one in which you put > your first preference first. Yeah, but who would assume sincere votes in a plurality system?
- RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. LAYTON Craig
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Martin Harper
- Re: Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. DEMOREP1
- Re: Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. David Catchpole
- RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. LAYTON Craig
- RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. David Catchpole
- RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Bart Ingles
- RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Bart Ingles
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Markus Schulze
- RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. LAYTON Craig
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Martin Harper
