In a message dated 12/11/00 5:25:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: <<Votes: A>B>C A>B>C A>B>C B>A>C B>A>C C>A>B C>A>B C>A>B C>A>B Using plurality, C wins. If we assume that voters have rankings, _whether or not they can express them on their ballots_, then plurality fails a Condorcet criterion.>> --- D- The A and B votes are a standard divided majority (which I have been noting for years). Where is a YES/NO vote on each choice ???
- RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. LAYTON Craig
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Martin Harper
- Re: Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. DEMOREP1
- Re: Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. David Catchpole
- RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. LAYTON Craig
- RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. David Catchpole
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Bart Ingles
- RE: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. Bart Ingles
- Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion for plurality. MIKE OSSIPOFF
