While I agree with David and disagree with Donald on the substantive issue, I'd prefer that we not start flaming each other on this list. Tom At 04:34 PM 10/18/99 +1000, you wrote: >On Fri, 15 Oct 1999, Donald E Davison wrote: > >> Anyway, the Hare STV election will not have any wasted votes. Every > >What the **** are you on? Grrr! Read my earlier e-mail detailing the >increased waste of votes by Hare and talk to Markus, who I suspect will be >none-too-amused at your utilising his name to back up such a ********** >argument. [... snip ...]
- [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Donald E Davison
- Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Craig Carey
- Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule David Catchpole
- Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Tom Round
- Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Tom Round
- Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Craig Carey
- Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Craig Carey
- Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Bart Ingles
- Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Craig Carey
- Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Bart Ingles
- Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Craig Carey
