Craig Carey wrote:
> Example: Some method will find six winners:
>
> Case 1: paper=(ABCDEFGH), winner={C,D,E,F,G,H}, Satisfaction=63/256
> Case 2: paper=(ABCDEFGH), winner={B,I,J,K,L,M}, Satisfaction=1/4
>
> So the 2nd alternative is the alternative that the satisfaction value of
> the paper would prefer.
I see that if you assume that the utility of each successive ranked
choice declines by a factor of two, then the utility of a given choice
will always be greater then the sum of utilities of all lower choices.
What I was questioning was the use of base-2 satisfaction itself. Is
someone actually using this as an approximation of reality, or is it
just a basis for a certain class of examples?
--Bart
- Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule David Catchpole
- [EM] Parliamentary points of order Tom Round
- Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Tom Round
- Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Craig Carey
- Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Craig Carey
- Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Bart Ingles
- Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Craig Carey
- Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Bart Ingles
- Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Craig Carey
- [EM] Maybe a new thread is in order: Cross-Ta... David Catchpole
- Re: [EM] Maybe a new thread is in order .... Craig Carey
- Re: [EM] Maybe a new thread is in or... David Catchpole
- Re: [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule Markus Schulze
