> > Any tiebreaker must obviously be mathematically understandable to John/Mary Q. > Voter with 100 political I.Q.'s. And the issues involved in the choice of how to count the election must also be understandable. If John Q. Citizen were listening to this discussion about which rank-count rule is best, would he have any idea whom to believe? Rank-count issues are not understandable to most people, and if there's any debate, then you'll have a hopeless mess that will never get resolved. What makes anyone think that the discussion would be more successful in the public arena than on this list? Mike > >
- What about a meta election? Charles Fiterman
- Re: What about a meta election? Mike Ositoff
- Re: What about a meta election? Markus Schulze
- Re: What about a meta election? Charles Fiterman
- Re: What about a meta election? David Catchpole
- Re: What about a meta election? Markus Schulze
- Re: What about a meta election? Markus Schulze
- Re: What about a meta election? DEMOREP1
- Re: What about a meta election? Mike Ositoff
- Re: What about a meta election? Charles Fiterman
- Re: What about a meta election? Bart Ingles
- Re: What about a meta election? Mike Ositoff
- Re: What about a meta election? DEMOREP1
- Re: What about a meta election? Charles Fiterman
- Re: What about a meta election? New Democracy
- Re: What about a meta election? Markus Schulze
- Re: What about a meta election? DEMOREP1
- Re: What about a meta election? Markus Schulze
- Re: What about a meta election? DEMOREP1
