Re: What about a meta election?

[DEMOREP1]

Mr. Schulze wrote in part--

We do live in mathematics. You must not differ between mathematics and the
real world.

D- I note that EVERY election method having 3 or more choices apparently fails
one or more mathematical criteria.  

If there are less than N Condorcet winners when N are to be elected, then ANY
election method tiebreaker is apparently more or less arbitrary.  

Any tiebreaker must obviously be mathematically understandable to John/Mary Q.
Voter with 100 political I.Q.'s.