At 02:43 AM 10/3/98 EDT, you wrote: >Any tiebreaker must obviously be mathematically understandable to John/Mary Q. >Voter with 100 political I.Q.'s. By the definition of I.Q. half the voters will have over 100 and half under, its a median. As an election judge I can attest that 90% of the problems in an election will be due to the bottem 10% on the scale. You can't disenfranchise people just because they don't understand some complex system.
- What about a meta election? Charles Fiterman
- Re: What about a meta election? Mike Ositoff
- Re: What about a meta election? Markus Schulze
- Re: What about a meta election? Charles Fiterman
- Re: What about a meta election? David Catchpole
- Re: What about a meta election? Markus Schulze
- Re: What about a meta election? Markus Schulze
- Re: What about a meta election? DEMOREP1
- Re: What about a meta election? Mike Ositoff
- Re: What about a meta election? Charles Fiterman
- Re: What about a meta election? Bart Ingles
- Re: What about a meta election? Mike Ositoff
- Re: What about a meta election? DEMOREP1
- Re: What about a meta election? Charles Fiterman
- Re: What about a meta election? New Democracy
- Re: What about a meta election? Markus Schulze
- Re: What about a meta election? DEMOREP1
- Re: What about a meta election? Markus Schulze
- Re: What about a meta election? DEMOREP1
