It's true, as Demorep said, that if new voters join the election, the rightful result may well be different from what it was before. And the 1st choice of the new voters might rightffully lose. Unfortunately, that means that those new voters have incentive to falsify some of their preferences--if they can predict the results well enough. But, if the best methods fail the No-Show Criterion, and if it's difficult or impossible for those new voters to actually predict well enough to strategize, then I'd say that a No-Show failure by methods that we otherwise consider the best should be accepted. Mike
- Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Markus Schulze
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Markus Schulze
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Markus Schulze
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. DEMOREP1
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. DEMOREP1
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Markus Schulze
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. DEMOREP1
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. DEMOREP1
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Markus Schulze
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. David Marsay
