election-methods-list  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Optimal? not DEMOREP1
• Partial clones DEMOREP1
• Not always impossible? Saari
  • Typo Mike Ositoff
• Sets and Plurality losers DEMOREP1
  • RE: Sets and Plurality losers DEMOREP1
• Dropping Last Choices DEMOREP1
• Smallest YES tiebreaker DEMOREP1
• 3 Choices again, 4 July 1998 DEMOREP1
  • RE: 3 Choices again, 4 July 1998 DEMOREP1
• Clones DEMOREP1
  • RE: Clones DEMOREP1
• Re: Six criteria Saari
  • Re: Six criteria Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Six criteria Markus Schulze
  • RE: Six criteria DEMOREP1
• Approval and the Bucklins DEMOREP1
• Overstated Problems Mike Ositoff
• ACE Encyclopedia DEMOREP1
  • RE: ACE Encyclopedia DEMOREP1
• Halfway Bucklin Tiebreaker DEMOREP1
  • RE: Halfway Bucklin Tiebreaker DEMOREP1
• Concluding Tobin Reply Mike Ositoff
• Re: Standards Saari
  • Re: Standards Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Standards DEMOREP1
  • Qualifying My Statements On List Mike Ositoff
  • Re: standards Blake Cretney
  • Re: Standards MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Tobin: Margins & Standards Mike Ositoff
• Bare majority winners DEMOREP1
  • RE: Bare majority winners DEMOREP1
• 4 choice circular tie DEMOREP1
• Reverse Bucklin- one loser at a time DEMOREP1
• Reverse Bucklin vs. Instant Runoff DEMOREP1
• Defective Methods DEMOREP1
• New! Technoblather Writing Contest! New Democracy
• RE: Reverse Bucklin tiebreaker-Supp 5 errata DEMOREP1
• Positive Involvement; No-Show Markus Schulze
  • Re: Positive Involvement; No-Show Mike Ositoff
  • RE: Positive Involvement; No-Show DEMOREP1
  • Re: Positive Involvement; No-Show DEMOREP1
  • Re: Positive Involvement; No-Show DEMOREP1
  • Re: Positive Involvement; No-Show Markus Schulze
• RE: Reverse Bucklin tiebreaker DEMOREP1
  • RE: Reverse Bucklin tiebreaker DEMOREP1
  • RE: Reverse Bucklin tiebreaker DEMOREP1
  • RE: Reverse Bucklin tiebreaker DEMOREP1
  • RE: Reverse Bucklin tiebreaker DEMOREP1
  • RE: Reverse Bucklin tiebreaker Michael McPhail
  • RE: Reverse Bucklin tiebreaker DEMOREP1
  • RE: Reverse Bucklin tiebreaker DEMOREP1
  • RE: Reverse Bucklin tiebreaker Markus Schulze
  • RE: Reverse Bucklin tiebreaker DEMOREP1
• Majority Rule p.s. Mike Ositoff
• Basic principle? Saari
  • Re: Basic principle? [EM] Fillard Rhyne
  • Re: Basic principle? [EM] Mike Ositoff
  • Basic principle? Saari
• This Method Never Has Subcycle Fratricide Mike Ositoff
• Re: Near Clone Sets-Tideman DEMOREP1
• Insincere Equal Rankings Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Insincere Equal Rankings Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Insincere Equal Rankings Hugh Tobin
  • Re: Insincere Equal Rankings Mike Ositoff
• Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Markus Schulze
  • Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Markus Schulze
  • Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Markus Schulze
  • Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. DEMOREP1
  • Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. DEMOREP1
  • Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Markus Schulze
  • Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. DEMOREP1
  • Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. DEMOREP1
  • Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Markus Schulze
  • Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. David Marsay
• Strangeness Mike Ositoff
• Regretful voters. No-Show. Mike Ositoff
• Near Clone Sets Mike Ositoff
  • Re: Near Clone Sets Markus Schulze
  • Re: Near Clone Sets Markus Schulze
• Subcycle Rule: Sorry About That! Mike Ositoff
• Circular ties revisited DEMOREP1
• Welcome Back Mike O New Democracy
• point systems use more information? Mike Ositoff
  • Re: point systems use more information? David Marsay
• Head to Head 5/23/98 DEMOREP1
• RE: District Quota Method DEMOREP1
• RE: Honest vs. manipulated ratings DEMOREP1
• RE: Adjusted Majority Preference Voting for PR? DEMOREP1
• sorry everyone Kevin Toyne
• Re:Write in votes Saari
  • Re:Write in votes Rob Lanphier
  • Re: Write in votes Saari
  • Re: Write in votes Rob Lanphier
  • Re: Write in votes Saari
  • Re: Write in votes Hugh Tobin
  • Re: Write in votes DEMOREP1
  • Re: Write in votes Saari
• Re: Erratic Results and Non-Erractic Results Olli Salmi
• Supermajority New Democracy
  • Re: Supermajority Saari
  • Re: Supermajority DEMOREP1
  • Re: Supermajority New Democracy
• RE: Multiple conflicting "majority" rules DEMOREP1
• Anti-PR Initiative Filed in Colorado Gary Swing
  • RE: Anti-PR Initiative Filed in Colorado DEMOREP1
• M.E.P. DEMOREP1
• Erratic Webster New Democracy
• The Case for Proportional Representation DEMOREP1
• Re: Exaggerated opinions David Marsay
  • Re: Exaggerated opinions New Democracy
  • RE: Exaggerated opinions DEMOREP1
  • Re: Exaggerated opinions David Marsay
  • Re: Exaggerated opinions Saari
  • Re: Exaggerated opinions David Marsay
  • Re: Exaggerated opinions Markus Schulze
  • Re: Exaggerated opinions David Marsay
  • Re: Exaggerated opinions Markus Schulze
  • Re: Exaggerated opinions David Marsay
  • Re: Exaggerated opinions Saari
  • Re: Exaggerated opinions Markus Schulze
  • Re: Exaggerated opinions Markus Schulze
  • Re: Exaggerated opinions Saari
  • Re: Exaggerated opinions Rob Lanphier
  • Re: Exaggerated opinions DEMOREP1
  • Re: Exaggerated opinions Saari
  • Re: Exaggerated opinions David Marsay
  • Re: Exaggerated opinions Rob Lanphier
  • Re: Exaggerated opinions DEMOREP1
  • Re: Exaggerated opinions Saari
• Hallett's Second Best Method New Democracy
• RE: An election method to replace MMP Olli Salmi
• Australian Multi-Member Multi-Constituency Elections New Democracy
  • RE: Australian Multi-Member Multi-Constituency Elections Fillard Rhyne
  • RE: Australian Multi-Member Multi-Constituency Elections New Democracy
• Proposed MMP ballot initiative in Colorado New Democracy
  • Re: Proposed MMP ballot initiative in Colorado Kurt Spitzer
  • Re: Proposed MMP ballot initiative in Colorado DEMOREP1
  • Re: Proposed MMP ballot initiative in Colorado DEMOREP1
  • Re: Proposed MMP ballot initiative in Colorado DEMOREP1
  • Re: Proposed MMP ballot initiative in Colorado New Democracy
  • Re: Proposed MMP ballot initiative in Colorado New Democracy
  • Re: Proposed MMP ballot initiative in Colorado Gary Swing
  • Re: Proposed MMP ballot initiative in Colorado Gary Swing
• The Davison Plan New Democracy
• Direct presidential elections DEMOREP1
• Median Rating Voting Rob Lanphier
  • Nevermind (Median Rating Voting) Rob Lanphier
  • RE: Median Rating Voting DEMOREP1
  • RE: Median Rating Voting Rob Lanphier
  • RE: Median Rating Voting DEMOREP1
• Re: Truncated ballots DEMOREP1
  • RE: Truncated ballots Gary Swing
  • Re: Truncated ballots DEMOREP1
  • Re: Truncated ballots Saari
  • Re: Truncated ballots Markus Schulze
  • Re: Truncated ballots DEMOREP1
• Test message Rob Lanphier
  • Truncated ballots David Marsay
• Archive shuffling Rob Lanphier
• Drafting Problems New Democracy
  • Re: Truncated ballots David Marsay
• Re: Condorcet quote Rob Lanphier
• RE: Voting on amendments DEMOREP1
• Re: HELP on Condorcet text. David Marsay
• Re: HELP!! Rob Lanphier
• Local Township Elections Bill and Missy
  • Re: Local Township Elections Steve Eppley
  • Re: Local Township Elections David Marsay
• Proportional representation Travis Schilling
  • Re: Proportional representation STEFAN LINTL
  • Re: Proportional representation STEFAN LINTL
• (Fwd) request for info re: defects of Borda's method Steve Eppley
• RE: [ER] Compact ballot formats DEMOREP1
• Condorcet Texts DEMOREP1
• RE: Approval is not preference DEMOREP1
• Re: Condorect sub-cycle rule Markus Schulze
  • Re: Condorect sub-cycle rule Markus Schulze
  • Re: Condorect sub-cycle rule Markus Schulze
  • Re: Condorect sub-cycle rule Saari
  • Re: Condorect sub-cycle rule David Marsay
  • Re: Condorect sub-cycle rule David Marsay
  • Re: Condorect sub-cycle rule Markus Schulze
  • Re: Condorect sub-cycle rule David Marsay
  • Explaining Condorcet (was Re: Condorcet sub-cycle rule) Steve Eppley
  • Re: Condorect sub-cycle rule Markus Schulze
  • Re: Condorect sub-cycle rule Markus Schulze
• Re: Arrow and Gibbard-Satterthwaite schulze
  • Re: Arrow and Gibbard-Satterthwaite Markus Schulze
  • Re: Arrow and Gibbard-Satterthwaite Markus Schulze
  • Re: Arrow and Gibbard-Satterthwaite Steve Eppley
• Economic Voting Travis Schilling
  • Re: Economic Voting JTGardens
• P.R. using single member districts DEMOREP1

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]