Markus Schulze wrote:--- Bucklin fails to meet my "No-Punishment Criterion". Example 1: 39 voters vote A > B > C. 10 voters vote B > A > B. 51 voters vote C > A > B. Bucklin elects candidate C. Example 2: 39 voters vote A > B > C. 10 voters vote B > A > B. 51 voters vote C > A > B. 06 voters vote B > C > A. Now, Bucklin elects candidate A. In other words, the additional 6 voters, who vote B > C > A, are "punished" for going to the poll. The example above also demonstrates, that Bucklin fails to meet Fishburn's "No-Show Criterion". ----- D- I suggest that Fishburn's "No-Show Criterion" and virtually all other "Criterion" are not relevant in breaking Condorcet circular ties. If initial conditions change (i.e. by adding more voters with different rankings), then the results can be expected to change.
- Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Markus Schulze
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Markus Schulze
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Markus Schulze
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. DEMOREP1
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. DEMOREP1
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Markus Schulze
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. DEMOREP1
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. DEMOREP1
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Markus Schulze
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. David Marsay
