On Fri, 12 Jun 1998, Markus Schulze wrote: > Dear Mike, > > you wrote (12 Jun 1998): > > And now, before someone else tells me, I must admit that > > the Smith//Condorcet(EM) with subcycle rule 2 violates > > Pareto, and GMC. > > This election method also violates the Monotonicity Criterion > and the No-Show Criterion. That makes it even less recommendable, the monotonicity violation. Thanks for taking the time to evaluate the method. I didn't know that the method violated monotonicity, but I was braced for the possibility, since it's an elimination method. Not that I can claim to know how that happens, till I work that example. Mike > > Markus > > > > > >
- Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Markus Schulze
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Markus Schulze
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Markus Schulze
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. DEMOREP1
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. DEMOREP1
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Markus Schulze
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. DEMOREP1
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. DEMOREP1
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Mike Ositoff
- Re: Regretted Turnout. Insincere = ranking. Markus Schulze
