>Okay, I understand the dropping rule: We look at how many voters supported >each victory, and eliminate the smallest victory of a cycle. It isn't necessarily "the" dropping rule. There are differences of opinion. Personally, I'm undecided - using defeat support seems to make more sense (and seems to be more democratic), but using margins eliminates some erratic properties. It is worth noting, too, that defeat support is more likely to punish a voter for truncating a vote. For some time I thought this was an advantage of defeat support (in that it encourages full rankings, and therefore political participation), but I no longer believe that this is the case.
- Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Appr... Tom Ruen
- Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Appr... Martin Harper
- Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Appr... Tom Ruen
- RE: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule LAYTON Craig
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Tom Ruen
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Blake Cretney
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Blake Cretney
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Tom Ruen
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule LAYTON Craig
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
- RE: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Richard Moore
- Re: [EM] Dyadic Approval Martin Harper
- RE: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule LAYTON Craig
- RE: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule LAYTON Craig
- RE: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Markus Schulze
