>Let me verify: Is this what you want? I'm sorry--I thought I said what I meant. A defeat's "defeat-support" is the number of people who've voted for that defeat. And not voting A over B, or B over A, shouldn't be counted as voting for A over B and for B over A. > >I will compute for each pair election ballot: >A>B: 1 point for A >B>A: 1 point for B >A=B: no points for either >A ranked, B unranked: 1 point for A >B ranked, A unranked: 1 point for B >A unranked, B unranked: no points for either Yes, that's what I meant to say (but didn't say?), if when you say "1 point for A", you mean one vote counted for A against B, in the pairwise comparison of A & B. Mike Ossipoff _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
- Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Appr... Tom Ruen
- RE: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule LAYTON Craig
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Tom Ruen
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Blake Cretney
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Blake Cretney
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Tom Ruen
- RE: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule LAYTON Craig
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
- RE: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
- RE: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Richard Moore
- Re: [EM] Dyadic Approval Martin Harper
- RE: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule LAYTON Craig
- RE: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule LAYTON Craig
- RE: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Markus Schulze
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
