>>About interpreting ties, my opinion is: >Tied rankings give 0.5 vote among 2. >Two unranked candidates get no votes. That isn't how we do it here. Again, partly because it eliminates the desirable properties of Condorcet. But also partly because it's undemocratic to record a pairwise preference vote that the voter never expressed. If I vote A & B equal, voting them both over C, then I'm casting A>C and B>C, but I'm not voting any preferences between A & B. Not half preferences. Not equal & opposite preferences. No preferences. Mike Ossipoff _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
- Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval - div... Tom Ruen
- Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Approval ... Martin Harper
- Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Appro... Tom Ruen
- Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Appro... Martin Harper
- Re: [EM] Unranked IRV versus Appro... Tom Ruen
- RE: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule LAYTON Craig
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Tom Ruen
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Blake Cretney
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Blake Cretney
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Tom Ruen
- RE: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule LAYTON Craig
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
- RE: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
- Re: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule Richard Moore
- Re: [EM] Dyadic Approval Martin Harper
- RE: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule LAYTON Craig
- RE: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule LAYTON Craig
- RE: [EM] Condorcet cyclic drop rule MIKE OSSIPOFF
