election-methods-list  

Messages by Thread

• RE: 02/06/02 - Adam's 02/02 example of three equal candidates: DEMOREP1
  • RE: 02/06/02 - Adam's 02/02 example of three equal candidates: DEMOREP1
• [EM] House Sets Campaign Finance Vote DEMOREP1
• Re: [EM] Definitions for Comparing Voting Power Alex Small
• [EM] Re: IRV in WA state DEMOREP1
• [EM] 02/06/02 - Adam's 02/02 example of three equal candidates: Donald Davison
  • Re: [EM] 02/06/02 - Adam's 02/02 example of three equal candidates: Adam Tarr
  • Re: [EM] 02/06/02 - Adam's 02/02 example of three equalcandidates: Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] 02/06/02 - Adam's 02/02 example of three equal candidates: Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] 02/06/02 - Adam's 02/02 example of three equal candidates: Richard Moore
• [EM] Re:Definitions for Comparing Voting Power Alex Small
• RE: Definitions for Comparing Voting Power DEMOREP1
• [EM] IRV in WA state Douglas Greene
  • Re: [EM] IRV in WA state MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] IRV in WA state Bart Ingles
  • [EM] IRV in WA state Anthony Simmons
  • Re: [EM] IRV in WA state Bart Ingles
• [EM] Definitions for Comparing Voting Power Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Definitions for Comparing Voting Power Forest Simmons
• [EM] State legislatures minority rule dats DEMOREP1
• RE: Blake & strategy DEMOREP1
• Re: [EM] Comparing ranked versus unranked methods Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Comparing ranked versus unranked methods Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Comparing ranked versus unranked methods Adam Tarr
  • Re: [EM] Comparing ranked versus unranked methods Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Comparing ranked versus unranked methods Adam Tarr
  • Re: [EM] Comparing ranked versus unranked methods Adam Tarr
  • Re: [EM] Comparing ranked versus unranked methods Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Comparing ranked versus unranked methods Adam Tarr
  • Re: [EM] Comparing ranked versus unranked methods Forest Simmons
• Re: Comparing ranked versus unranked methods MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: Comparing ranked versus unranked methods DEMOREP1
• [EM] Blake & strategy MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Re: 02/03/02 - STV for Candidate Lists: DEMOREP1
• [EM] IRV's criteria successes? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Re: Markus & Manipulability MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Re: [EM] Book- Evaluation and Optimization of Electoral Systems Joe Weinstein
• RE: Kuro5hin discussion on Political Parties DEMOREP1
• [EM] 02/04/02 - Approval is only for Beauty Contests: Donald Davison
  • Re: [EM] 02/04/02 - Approval is only for Beauty Contests: Mark Borg
  • Re: [EM] 02/04/02 - Approval is only for Beauty Contests: Richard Moore
• [EM] 02/04/02 - Welcome to the Hare camp: Donald Davison
• [EM] Kuro5hin discussion on Political Parties Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Newcomers Claim New Orleans Runoff DEMOREP1
• [EM] 02/03/02 - STV for Candidate Lists: Donald Davison
  • Re: [EM] 02/03/02 - STV for Candidate Lists: Adam Tarr
  • Re: [EM] 02/03/02 - STV for Candidate Lists: Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] 02/03/02 - STV for Candidate Lists: Olli Salmi
  • [EM] Open and Closed Lists (was ...STV for Candidate...) Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] Open and Closed Lists (was ...STV for Candidate...) Olli Salmi
• [EM] Reply re: CVD. The Heritage Criterion. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Sincerity for criteria, Blake MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Sincerity for criteria, Blake Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] Sincerity for criteria, Blake Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Sincerity for criteria, Blake Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] Sincerity for criteria, Blake Forest Simmons
• [EM] Markus & Manipulability MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Markus & Manipulability Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Markus & Manipulability Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Markus & Manipulability Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Markus & Manipulability Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Markus & Manipulability Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Markus & Manipulability Joe Weinstein
  • Re: [EM] Markus & Manipulability Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Markus & Manipulability Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] Markus & Manipulability Forest Simmons
• RE: 02/02/02 - Alexander, don't get stuck in a `Time Warp': DEMOREP1
• [EM] Re: Alexander, don't get stuck in a `Time Warp': Alexander Small
• [EM] 02/02/02 - Re: 01/31/02 - Two new design features for STV: Donald Davison
• [EM] 0/03/02 - FWD - [instantrunoff] IRV @ Carleton College! Donald Davison
• [EM] 02/02/02 - FWD - The Australian Senate: Donald Davison
• [EM] 02/02/02 - FWD - WA State IRV bill hearing to be webcast: Donald Davison
• [EM] 02/02/02 - Alexander, don't get stuck in a `Time Warp': Donald Davison
  • Re: [EM] 02/02/02 - Alexander, don't get stuck in a `Time Warp': Adam Tarr
  • Re: [EM] 02/02/02 - Alexander, don't get stuck in a `Time Warp': Forest Simmons
  • [EM] 02/02/02 - Alexander, don't get stuck in a `Time Warp': Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Power of Voting Blocs Alexander Small
• [EM] My definition better carries out P&P's intent MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] my IIAC suggestion MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Plurality & Reguarity MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Plurality & Reguarity Markus Schulze
• [EM] 02/01/02 - IRVing is superior in math, Steve Barney: Donald Davison
  • Re: [EM] 02/01/02 - IRVing is superior in math, Steve Barney: Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] 02/01/02 - IRVing is superior in math, Steve Barney: Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] 02/01/02 - IRVing is superior in math, Steve Barney: Adam Tarr
  • Re: [EM] 02/01/02 - IRVing is superior in math, Steve Barney: Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] 02/01/02 - IRVing is superior in math, Steve Barney: Forest Simmons
• [EM] World Series and EC Anthony Simmons
  • Re: [EM] World Series and EC Anthony Simmons
  • Re: [EM] World Series and EC Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Electoral College and Minority Vetoes Anthony Simmons
• [EM] World Series and EC Alexander Small
  • Re: [EM] World Series and EC Adam Tarr
  • Re: [EM] World Series and EC Richard Moore
• [EM] Electoral College and Minority Vetoes Alexander Small
• RE: Condorcet Criterion definitions (was Markus' Econometrica reference...) DEMOREP1
• [EM] 01/31/02 - Two new design features for STV: Donald Davison
  • Re: [EM] 01/31/02 - Two new design features for STV: Adam Tarr
• [EM] Idaho Lawmakers OK Term Limit Repeal DEMOREP1
• [EM] P&P say there's only 1 preference profile. You don't say that. MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] P&P say there's only 1 preference profile. You don't say that. Markus Schulze
• re: P&P & preferences & Blake MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Consensus on IRV & Runoff? DEMOREP1
• [EM] Monotony and consistency - 3 examples Joe Weinstein
  • Re: [EM] Monotony and consistency - 3 examples Joe Weinstein
  • Re: [EM] Monotony and consistency - 3 examples Forest Simmons
• [EM] Basic Monotony Joe Weinstein
  • Re: [EM] Basic Monotony Richard Moore
• Re: Consensus on IRV & Runoff? MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: Consensus on IRV & Runoff? Forest Simmons
  • Re: Consensus on IRV & Runoff? Forest Simmons
• [EM] Condorcet Criterion definitions (was Markus' Econometrica reference...) MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion definitions (was Markus' Econometrica reference...) Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion definitions (was Markus' Econometrica reference...) Adam Tarr
  • Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion definitions (was Markus' Econometrica reference...) Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Doesn't matter what preference means, Markus MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Doesn't matter what preference means, Markus Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] Doesn't matter what preference means, Markus Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Doesn't matter what preference means, Markus Anthony Simmons
• RE: Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff DEMOREP1
  • RE: Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff DEMOREP1
  • Re: Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Steve Barney
  • Re: Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Forest Simmons
  • RE: Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff DEMOREP1
  • RE: Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff DEMOREP1
• Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Steve Barney
  • Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff Steve Barney
• [EM] Question on CVD Alexander Small
  • Re: [EM] Question on CVD Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] Question on CVD Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Electoral College-Pragmatic approach Alexander Small
  • Re: [EM] Electoral College-Pragmatic approach Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] Electoral College-Pragmatic approach Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] Electoral College-Pragmatic approach Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] Electoral College-Pragmatic approach Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Interest in voting theory Steve Barney
  • [EM] Not logical electoral system? Jurij Toplak
  • Re: [EM] Not logical electoral system? Olli Salmi
• Re: [EM] Re: Electoral College Forest Simmons
• Re: Fascinating website MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: Fascinating website Richard Moore
  • Re: Fascinating website Anthony Simmons
  • Re: Fascinating website Anthony Simmons
  • Re: Fascinating website MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] More uses for grade ballots Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: The Electoral College (was Interesting use of Borda count) DEMOREP1
• [EM] 01/29/02 - Re: Electoral College Debate: Donald Davison
  • Re: [EM] 01/29/02 - Re: Electoral College Debate: Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] 01/29/02 - Re: Electoral College Debate: Richard Moore
• [EM] Fascinating web site Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Regarding the interesting website MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Re: [EM] The Electoral College (was Interesting use of Borda count) Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] The Electoral College (was Interesting use of Borda count) Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] The Electoral College (was Interesting use of Borda count) Anthony Simmons
• [EM] The Electoral College Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Re: Field of 15 Run for New Orleans Mayor MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Re: Markus' Econometrica reference on RB & IIAC MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: Markus' Econometrica reference on RB & IIAC MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: Markus' Econometrica reference on RB & IIAC Blake Cretney
  • RE: Markus' Econometrica reference on RB & IIAC DEMOREP1
• [EM] Field of 15 Run for New Orleans Mayor DEMOREP1
• [EM] Re: Electoral College Alexander Small
  • Re: [EM] Re: Electoral College Jurij Toplak
  • Re: [EM] Re: Electoral College Bart Ingles
  • [EM] Re: Electoral College Alexander Small
• [EM] OT - Humor: Donald Davison
• [EM] 01/27/02 - Re: PR/STV Hybrid for multi-winner? Donald Davison
  • [EM] 01/27/02 - Re: PR/STV Hybrid for multi-winner? Adam Tarr
• [EM] Markus' Econometrica reference on RB & IIAC MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Markus' Econometrica reference on RB & IIAC Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Markus' Econometrica reference on RB & IIAC Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Markus' Econometrica reference on RB & IIAC Markus Schulze
• RE: The Electoral College (was Interesting use of Borda count) DEMOREP1
• Re: Interesting Website MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: Interesting Website Anthony Simmons
• [EM] PR/STV Hybrid for multi-winner? Adam Tarr
  • Re: [EM] PR/STV Hybrid for multi-winner? Olli Salmi
  • Re: [EM] PR/STV Hybrid for multi-winner? Mark Borg
  • Re: [EM] PR/STV Hybrid for multi-winner? Adam Tarr
  • Re: [EM] PR/STV Hybrid for multi-winner? Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] PR/STV Hybrid for multi-winner? DEMOREP1
• [EM] Interesting site Anthony Simmons

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]