election-methods-list  

Messages by Thread

• [EM] Net Wins Tiebreaker, Supp. 9 DEMOREP1
• [EM] Net Wins Tiebreaker, Supp. 8 DEMOREP1
• [EM] Schulze and Margins was: Reversal Software output 6/9/1999 Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] Schulze and Margins was: Reversal Software output 6/9/1999 Markus Schulze
• [EM] Net Wins Tiebreaker, Supp. 7 DEMOREP1
• [EM] Truncations Math DEMOREP1
• [EM] Path Voting Algorithm Paul Dumais
  • Re: [EM] Path Voting Algorithm Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Path Voting Algorithm Paul Dumais
  • Re: [EM] Path Voting Algorithm Markus Schulze
• RE: Pairwise Rated Benchmarks DEMOREP1
  • Re: Pairwise Rated Benchmarks Bart Ingles
• [EM] FWD - Mike Ossipoff comments on the Tannenwald letter Donald E Davison
• [EM] Pairwise Rated Benchmarks Bart Ingles
• [EM] Reversal Software output 6/9/1999 Steve Eppley
  • Re: [EM] Reversal Software output 6/9/1999 Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] Reversal Software output 6/9/1999 Markus Schulze
• [EM] Net Wins Tiebreaker, Supp. 6 DEMOREP1
• [EM] Voting space David Catchpole
• [EM] Net Wins Tiebreakers, Supp. 5 DEMOREP1
• [EM] 3-candidate ratio space (Or how learnt to stop worrying and love linear algebra) (fwd) David Catchpole
• [EM] Net Wins Tiebreaker, Supp. 4 DEMOREP1
• [EM] Humor - Understanding the Metric System Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] Humor - Understanding the Metric System Herman Beun
• [EM] Replace Bucklin with Run-Off Without Elimination Donald E Davison
• [EM] Summary of order reversal software output Steve Eppley
  • Re: [EM] Summary of order reversal software output Markus Schulze
  • [EM] summary of order reversal software output (6/6/1999) Steve Eppley
• [EM] Net Wins Tiebreaker, Supp. 3 DEMOREP1
• [EM] Net Wins Tiebreaker, Supp. 2 DEMOREP1
• [EM] Net Wins Tiebreaker, Supp. 1 DEMOREP1
  • [EM] Net Wins Tiebreaker, Supp. 1 DEMOREP1
• [EM] Compiling party lists (FWD) DEMOREP1
• [EM] Net Wins Tiebreaker DEMOREP1
• [EM] Replacement Candidates? - Where are you hiding? Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] Replacement Candidates? - Where are you hiding? Ron Tannenwald
  • Re: [EM] Replacement Candidates? - Where are you hiding? Bart Ingles
• RE: Weighted Votes DEMOREP1
• [EM] Weighted Votes DEMOREP1
• [EM] A Vermont Rep comments on Vermont's House election Donald E Davison
• RE: Head to Head Comparison of Election Methods DEMOREP1
  • Re: Head to Head Comparison of Election Methods Paul Dumais
  • Re: Head to Head Comparison of Election Methods DEMOREP1
  • Re: Head to Head Comparison of Election Methods Ron Tannenwald
  • Re: Head to Head Comparison of Election Methods Bart Ingles
  • Re: Head to Head Comparison of Election Methods DEMOREP1
  • Re: Head to Head Comparison of Election Methods Blake Cretney
  • RE: Head to Head Comparison of Election Methods DEMOREP1
• [EM] Head to Head Comparison of Election Methods Paul Dumais
  • Re: [EM] Head to Head Comparison of Election Methods Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] Head to Head Comparison of Election Methods Michael A. Schoenfield
  • Re: [EM] Head to Head Comparison of Election Methods Paul Dumais
  • Re: [EM] Head to Head Comparison of Election Methods Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] Head to Head Comparison of Election Methods Paul Dumais
  • Re: [EM] Head to Head Comparison of Election Methods Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] Head to Head Comparison of Election Methods Paul Dumais
  • Re: [EM] Head to Head Comparison of Election Methods Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] Head to Head Comparison of Election Methods Paul Dumais
  • Re: [EM] Head to Head Comparison of Election Methods DEMOREP1
  • Re: [EM] Head to Head Comparison of Election Methods Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Head to Head Comparison of Election Methods Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] Head to Head Comparison of Election Methods Paul Dumais
  • Re: [EM] Head to Head Comparison of Election Methods Markus Schulze
• RE: Bart's "Median Rating" method? DEMOREP1
  • RE: Bart's "Median Rating" method? Steve Eppley
  • Re: Bart's "Median Rating" method? DEMOREP1
  • RE: Bart's "Median Rating" method? DEMOREP1
• Re: Smallest Change for Greatest Improvement DEMOREP1
  • Re: Smallest Change for Greatest Improvement Steve Eppley
  • Re: Smallest Change for Greatest Improvement Bart Ingles
• [EM] Percentages are based on totals Donald E Davison
• [EM] Swing Voters decide Primary of Major Parties Donald E Davison
• [EM] another correction of 2-member-disctrict mayoral
• [EM] Bart's "Median Rating" method? Steve Eppley
  • Re: [EM] Bart's "Median Rating" method? Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] Bart's "Median Rating" method? Steve Eppley
  • Re: [EM] Bart's "Median Rating" method? Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] Bart's "Median Rating" method? Bart Ingles
• [EM] Smallest Change for Greatest Improvement in Single-Seat Elections Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] Smallest Change for Greatest Improvement in Single-Seat Elections Steve Eppley
  • Re: [EM] Smallest Change for Greatest Improvement in Single-Seat Elections Bart Ingles
• [EM] Six Upgrades to the Single Seat District method Donald E Davison
• [EM] Two FWD letters on Two member districts Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] Two FWD letters on Two member districts DEMOREP1
• [EM] Candidates nominated by two parties Donald E Davison
• [EM] One District P.R. Method DEMOREP1
• [EM] Math Corrections: Vermont's Two Member Districts Donald E Davison
• [EM] Vermont's Two Member Districts Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] Vermont's Two Member Districts David Catchpole
  • Re: [EM] Vermont's Two Member Districts Tom Round
  • Re: [EM] Vermont's Two Member Districts Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] Vermont's Two Member Districts David Catchpole
  • Re: [EM] Vermont's Two Member Districts Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] Vermont's Two Member Districts Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] Vermont's Two Member Districts Bart Ingles
• [EM] My nasty system for advantaging urban parties David Catchpole
  • Re: [EM] My nasty system for advantaging urban parties Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] My nasty system for advantaging urban parties David Catchpole
  • RE: [EM] My nasty system for advantaging urban parties David Catchpole
• [EM] Ratings-based standards Bart Ingles
• Re: Ratings as a Standard Bart Ingles
  • Re: Ratings as a Standard Blake Cretney
  • Re: Ratings as a Standard Bart Ingles
  • Re: Ratings as a Standard Blake Cretney
  • Re: Ratings as a Standard Bart Ingles
  • Re: Ratings as a standard DEMOREP1
• Ratings as a Standard was: Re: [EM] FWD: Borda Count by Paul Dumais Blake Cretney
  • Re: Ratings as a Standard Bart Ingles
• [EM] YES/Condorcet Method DEMOREP1
• [EM] Borda vs a majority of the first choices Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] Borda vs a majority of the first choices Bart Ingles
• [EM] Election Methods 101 DEMOREP1
• [EM] Borda- Young example DEMOREP1
  • Re: [EM] Borda- Young example Paul Dumais
• [EM] Various election methods DEMOREP1
• [EM] The Ultimate Method? Paul's Borda Count - #2 Paul Dumais
  • Re: The Ultimate Method? Paul's Borda Count - #2 - "Dumais" Paul Dumais
  • Re: [EM] The Ultimate Method? Paul's Borda Count - #2 Blake Cretney
• [EM] I stand corrected - thank God for little favors Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] I stand corrected - thank God for little favors Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] I stand corrected - thank God for little favors Blake Cretney
• [EM] Second Opinion please Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] Second Opinion please Blake Cretney
• [EM] Salva Count Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] Salva Count Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] Salva Count mayoral
  • Re: [EM] Salva Count Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] Salva Count DEMOREP1
• [EM] Nanson Criteria was Re: Fw: A further elucidation of my arguments Blake Cretney
• [EM] Path Voting Paul Dumais
• Re: Fw: A further elucidation of my arguments Paul Dumais
  • Re: Fw: A further elucidation of my arguments David Catchpole
  • Re: Fw: A further elucidation of my arguments Paul Dumais
  • Re: Fw: A further elucidation of my arguments David Catchpole
• [EM] Election Methods Resource Donald E Davison
• [EM] I'm new mayoral
• Re: Borda Count by Paul Dumais Markus Schulze
  • Re: Borda Count by Paul Dumais Paul Dumais
• [EM] Some FWD letters from Paul Dumais Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] Some FWD letters from Paul Dumais Bart Ingles
• Re: Reply #2: [EM] FWD: Borda Count by Paul Dumais Paul Dumais
  • Re: Reply #2: [EM] FWD: Borda Count by Paul Dumais Blake Cretney
  • Re: Reply #2: [EM] FWD: Borda Count by Paul Dumais Paul Dumais
  • Re: Reply #2: [EM] FWD: Borda Count by Paul Dumais Blake Cretney
  • Re: Reply #2: [EM] FWD: Borda Count by Paul Dumais Paul Dumais
  • Re: Reply #2: [EM] FWD: Borda Count by Paul Dumais Blake Cretney
• [EM] Salva, Dumais, and the EM list Donald E Davison
• [EM] FWD: Borda Count by Paul Dumais Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] FWD: Borda Count by Paul Dumais Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] FWD: Borda Count by Paul Dumais Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] FWD: Borda Count by Paul Dumais Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] FWD: Borda Count by Paul Dumais Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] FWD: Borda Count by Paul Dumais Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] FWD: Borda Count by Paul Dumais Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] FWD: Borda Count by Paul Dumais Bart Ingles
• [EM] FWD: Is Salva better than Borda? Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] FWD: Is Salva better than Borda? David Catchpole
• [EM] Salva presents an example Donald E Davison
• [EM] Ronald Tannenwald's example Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] Ronald Tannenwald's example Ron Tannenwald
  • Re: [EM] Ronald Tannenwald's example Donald E Davison
• [EM] Salva Voting - multi-seat example Donald E Davison
• [EM] More from Salva on Salva Voting Donald E Davison
• [EM] Salva Voting - a single winner method Donald E Davison
  • Re: [ER] Salva Voting - a single winner method Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] Salva Voting - a single winner method Ron Tannenwald
• Re: What do you call it? Donald E Davison
• [EM] The Most Gain for the Smallest Change Donald E Davison
  • RE: [EM] The Most Gain for the Smallest Change Wiseman, Julian
• [EM] What do you call it? Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] What do you call it? David Catchpole
• [EM] U.S. Congressional Elections, 1788-1997 book DEMOREP1
• [EM] CNN/IFES Election Watch DEMOREP1
• [EM] IPU Election Systems data DEMOREP1
• [EM] Brits OK End to Hereditary Rights (FWD) DEMOREP1
  • Re: [EM] Brits OK End to Hereditary Rights (FWD) Tom Round
• [EM] HR 1173 DEMOREP1
• [EM] Israel P.R. system DEMOREP1
• [EM] Science News letters address Bart Ingles
• [EM] FWD - How to Fix n Election Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] FWD - How to Fix n Election Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] FWD - How to Fix n Election David Catchpole
• [EM] Bah Humbug... can someone prove/disprove a relationship for me? [g is rational (II)(n) on X implies g is rational (I)(n) on X] (fwd) Resent-Message-Id: <"g8Ows1.0.r-7.GiN-s"@mx1> David Catchpole
• [EM] Plan's changes result in new Single Seat method Donald E Davison
• [EM] Can someone prove/disprove a relationship for me? [g is rational (II)(n) on X implies g is rational (I)(n) on X] David Catchpole
  • Inevitable Correction Re: [EM] Can someone prove/disprove a relationship for me? [g is rational (II)(n) on X implies g is rational (I)(n) on X] David Catchpole
  • Second Inevitable Correction Re: [EM] Can someone prove/disprove a relationship for me? [g is rational (II)(n) on X implies g is rational (I)(n) on X] David Catchpole
• [EM] Instant Consensus voting method, by Steve Eppley Donald E Davison
• [EM] Just In Time Withdrawal - JITW Donald E Davison
• [EM] Diversity of opinion is the key. Donald E Davison
• Re: - Re: Circular Stand - Off Donald E Davison
• [EM] Problems I have with Peters and Wakker (1991) "Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives and Revealed Group Preferences" in Econometrica Vol. 59 No. 6 David Catchpole
• [EM] A very basic question ... Tom Round
• [EM] Persistent Majority (a new single-winner method) Steve Eppley
  • Re: [EM] Persistent Majority (a new single-winner method) Donald E Davison
• Re: Riera and Borrell presentation (FWD) DEMOREP1
  • Re: Riera and Borrell presentation (FWD) Michael A. Schoenfield
  • Re: Riera and Borrell presentation (FWD) Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Riera and Borrell presentation (FWD) DEMOREP1
• [EM] Making the Party List Selection more Democratic Donald E Davison

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]