On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 1:34 AM, robert bristow-johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > i almost never vote for > all 6. usually just 2. but it's a strategic vote. and since i didn't hit > the limit, it's practically no different than Approval voting. i cannot see > how Warren and company claim that it's less strategic than Condorcet.
Assuming 6 seats, optimal strategy is probably to approve either the 6th or 7th most popular candidate and all candidates you prefer to that candidate. If you run out of votes, the you should approve candidates who are most likely to tie for the 6th seat first before other candidates. In any case, you really should cast all 6 votes. ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
