yes, that's it. P.
2013/2/6 Kristofer Munsterhjelm <[email protected]>: > On 02/05/2013 09:37 PM, Peter Zbornik wrote: >> >> Hi Kristofer, >> >> I am afraid your approach might in some cases not lead to >> proportionally distributed quoted-in candidates. >> >> For instance, say we have three coalitions: A, B, C. >> Coalition A and B get their first place candidate >> Coalition C get their second place candidate quoted-in (i.e. they >> would prefer Agda, but they get Adam due to the quota rules). >> Coalition A and B get the third and fourth place candidates respectively. >> Coalition C, again, get their fifth place candidate quoted in (i.e. >> they would prefer Erica, but they get Eric due to the quota rules). >> >> This approach leads to an unproportional distribution of quoted-in >> seats (candidates) as Coalition C get both of the quoted-in candidates >> and Coalition A and B get none. > > > So you need not just proportionality in the group as a whole, but > proportionality within each gender too? > ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
