One other option is to have something called configure_applications (although something shorter would be ideal):
configure_applications: [logger: :start, other: :included, compile_time_only: :skip] We will automatically include all production deps but you can remove or add something by using configure_applications. Further thoughts? *José Valim* www.plataformatec.com.br Skype: jv.ptec Founder and Director of R&D On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:19 AM, José Valim < [email protected]> wrote: > I do think that the name OTP applications is unclear. > > > I agree. It has a double meaning: we can call all applications an OTP > applications or we can call the ones that ship part of OTP (the standard > library) an OTP application. Suggestions for better names? We could call it > `kernel_applications` or `stdlib_applications` if that's clearer? > > >> How does one determine if a production dependency is an application or >> not? >> > > Production dependencies must always be applications unless you have a very > special case of a production dependency that is compile-time only (and I > can't recall of any). > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAGnRm4LaURXvxibWK9JjSPJRaNRG2j3_ysgi9bUM_YHGsO%3DEHQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
