Eric Abrahamsen <e...@ericabrahamsen.net> writes:

> Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> [...]
>> C-c C-x t is free, tho.
> Oops, I think that's what I meant to type. Here's the latest version of
> the patch -- I removed the bit fooling with the location of point at the
> end, as it seemed simpler was better. How's this look?

`newline-and-indent' and `mark' shouldn't be used in the function.

Otherwise, it looks good. Could you provide some tests for that in

Thank you.


Nicolas Goaziou

Reply via email to