Nicolas Goaziou <> writes:

> Eric Abrahamsen <> writes:
>> I'm still not quite seeing this. This chunk should take care of it:
>>     (goto-char e)
>>     (if (bolp)
>>      (progn
>>        (skip-chars-backward " \n\t")
>>        (forward-line))
>>       (end-of-line)
>>       (insert "\n"))
>> If "e" is EOB, we do `end-of-line' and insert a newline, it should be
>> taken care of. I added a new clause in the test for this case, and it
>> seems to work fine... Am I missing anything?
> I don't think so. It looks correct, indeed.
> However, you sent the wrong patch. Could you send the updated patch
> again?

Ooof, maybe I need to take a little vacation from the computer. This
should be the right one.


Reply via email to