Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: > Eric Abrahamsen <e...@ericabrahamsen.net> writes: > >> I'm still not quite seeing this. This chunk should take care of it: >> >> (goto-char e) >> (if (bolp) >> (progn >> (skip-chars-backward " \n\t") >> (forward-line)) >> (end-of-line) >> (insert "\n")) >> >> If "e" is EOB, we do `end-of-line' and insert a newline, it should be >> taken care of. I added a new clause in the test for this case, and it >> seems to work fine... Am I missing anything? > > I don't think so. It looks correct, indeed. > > However, you sent the wrong patch. Could you send the updated patch > again?
Ooof, maybe I need to take a little vacation from the computer. This should be the right one. Thanks, Eric
