Eric Abrahamsen <> writes:

> I'm still not quite seeing this. This chunk should take care of it:
>     (goto-char e)
>     (if (bolp)
>       (progn
>         (skip-chars-backward " \n\t")
>         (forward-line))
>       (end-of-line)
>       (insert "\n"))
> If "e" is EOB, we do `end-of-line' and insert a newline, it should be
> taken care of. I added a new clause in the test for this case, and it
> seems to work fine... Am I missing anything?

I don't think so. It looks correct, indeed.

However, you sent the wrong patch. Could you send the updated patch

Thank you.


Reply via email to