Nicolas Goaziou <> writes:

> IMO, it would be more productive to think about what can be done in your
> situation instead. For example, one solution could be to require "[[" to
> be escaped in a link (current syntax already requires closing brackets
> to be escaped in some situations). I'm not yet sure how to deal with it,
> tho.

I updated the link syntax in maint, so it now requires to escape every
square bracket in the URI part of a link. This should fix this issue.
Please test it and let me know if there's anything suspicious.

Thank you.

Reply via email to