jman <[email protected]> writes: >>> In addition, I noticed that there are: >>> - https://github.com/orgmode >>> - https://github.com/org-mode >>> >>> which could end up being confusing if one day they get populated with >>> sources not "vetted" by the >>> project. >> >> Well. But what can we do? It is not like Org mode endorses or uses >> github. > > Ok then first let me ask a question: are these mirrors official or just > Bastien's initiatives? Both > the GitHub and Sourcehut repos are under his handle. But one is now in the > documentation and the > other one not.
github is an old mirror. However, github is not endorsed by FSF, so we have abandoned updating it. AFAIK, Bastien also moved his projects either to Sourcehut or to Codeberg. > Of course we cannot block a third-party on GitHub from impersonating the > orgmode organization, > that's too late now. What we /can/ do is pinning in the documentation the > official mirrors and hint > where users should go. That's done, right? > Speaking of mirrors: https://codeberg.org/{org-mode,orgmode} are both still > free. Following the same > reasoning, would it make sense setting foot there as well? I hope that for > Codeberg there are no > licensing concerns. Maybe. Codeberg is endorsed by FSF. But, on the other hand, it raises a question why would we need it. Should we try to own a place for every forge out there? That sounds like unnecessary burden. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
