jman <[email protected]> writes: >> Maybe. Codeberg is endorsed by FSF. >> But, on the other hand, it raises a question why would we need >> it. Should we try to own a place for every forge out there? That sounds >> like unnecessary burden. > > I don't want to steal further bandwidth from you about this topic, I just had > this thought about > "reserving" the handle on a FOSS platform and wanted to also hear from other > members of the > community.
I do not say that we should not do it. In fact, me and Bastien have been considering to move from Sourcehut to Codeberg, after we discovered some peculiarities of how Sourcehut handles build secrets. However, Codeberg does not provide reliable build systems and does not even have email support for issue replies, so it is not clear what would be the benefit. If we are really concerned about stability of the mirror/repo *URL*, we can setup redirect rules in orgmode.org that we can adjust as needed, without trying to use any particular git hosting. In fact, that's more or less what we do now. Try code.orgmode.org. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
