2014-06-12 20:54 GMT+02:00 Aaron Ecay <aarone...@gmail.com>: > Hi Eric, hi all, > > 2014ko ekainak 12an, Eric Schulte-ek idatzi zuen: >> >> I just ran across this need myself, and updated an old solution to work >> with the new exporter. See the thread and my solution at the following. >> >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2014-06/msg00238.html > > It’s really wonderful that you and the other members of the org > community have devoted lots of careful effort to this problem. See > also: > - http://orgmode.org/worg/org-hacks.html#ignoreheadline > - http://mid.gmane.org/87lhvvjoo0....@gmx.us > - http://mid.gmane.org/87zjii42k9....@ucl.ac.uk > > Many of the solutions work approximately, but not in all circumstances > – see the discussion on worg. Searching my email archives for the > string “ignoreheading” in 2014, I see threads from May 14, May 9, May > 6, March 27, March 17, and Jan 7 on this topic. It seems reasonable to > ask whether this constitutes enough user interest to make this a core > feature. The benefits would include: > - the code can be made robust by the combined effort of those > interested > - the feature can be incorporated into the test suite, so it won’t > accidentally break in the future > - it will be more “discoverable” in the org info manual (which almost > certainly gets a larger audience than worg) >
I also ran across this need. What I had in mind was that certain todo types would be treated as inline. For instance, if "P" was a member of this hypothetical org-inline-todo-keywords, then * P a paragraph some contents would be rendered as some contents by the exporter, no matter the backend. Such a feature is more generic and would be useful in other contexts ; and the LaTeX-related issues discussed in this thread would be solved using something like * INLINE appendix \appendix * Appendix 1 Cheers, Nicolas