Jean Louis <[email protected]> writes: > You can modify and study datasets on any average computer. > > You can modify and study inference software on any computer.
I'm sure you have downloaded the PBs of data needed and spent your time modifying and studying it. > I have 1060 GPU in other computer, one 17 year old is able to study it > there in other room. Ah, how many models have you trained with that? > No, to do your verifications and research you really do not need much > hardware. > > Problem is you did not try it yet assumed some position. So I can't > argue from your viewpoint. Try it. > >>> Sorry, that is wrong comparison. >> >> No it is not. > > You said DuckDuckGo is service as a software substitute. Who Does That > Server Really Serve? - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation: > https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-serve.html > > You can surely claim to be so. No problem. > > Yet for those other readers who may wonder why I said it is wrong > comparison, is good to read that article and section named To Which > Activities Is the Issue of SaaSS Applicable? > >> [...] >>> Anthropic also stole a lot of code from free software >> >> If you think anthropic/openai/whatever stole any code, please sue them. > > A group of authors, led by Andrea Bartz, sued Anthropic for using > unauthorized copies of their books in its training datasets. Read again, I wrote *code* > That's uncalled for. > > If you have nothing substantive to add to the discussion, you can simply > say so. But dismissing my points with a patronizing remark like that is > not an argument—it's just rudeness. It is uncalled for, rude and anti-social behavior to use LLMs in a public conversation. You are just sending me walls of text with 0 substance and expect a reply from me. -- Thanos Apollo ☧ https://thanosapollo.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- via emacs-tangents mailing list (https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-tangents)
