On Jan 25, 2010, at 8:24 AM, Chris Lawson wrote: > > Aside from that, I'd like to know what the compelling argument for 10.6-only > support *is*, other than "it simplifies things". Because presumably we aren't > going to be dropping support for the previous OS version as soon as a new > version ships going forward. I'm not trying to say we should support 10.4, > *ever*, but if we get this thing out the door and 10.5 is still > current-minus-one, I'd like to know why, exactly, we're going to force people > to upgrade to 10.6. That seems...unfriendly.
I'm thus far mostly a dabbler in Objective-C/Cocoa programming (I've got one pet-project-in-progress written with it), but I wouldn't be at all surprised if GCD alone was worth dropping backwards compatibility for... Timothy Collett -- "I think there is a world market for maybe five computers." ~ Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list List help: http://lists.ranchero.com/listinfo.cgi/email-init-ranchero.com
