>>Me too. The problem here is that there is no one that will be able to >>develop something compatible with AOL anymore. Claris was the only one >>that AOL ever gave its protocol to EVER and you won't ever see that >>happening again, sad to say. >can anyone say: >"reverse engineering"?
Instead of trying to write a new app that won't be able to link to AOL, is there a way to write an app that will let CE run inside or through it in OSX? So long as CE is running, I don't think AOL would have a a court case. I'm just brainstorming, but I'm figuring if CE is already built and does what we want it to do, then the real issue/problem is getting it to work (or think it's working) in OSX v. Classic. I'm not a programmer or developer, but I think our solution will lie in how we approach this "opportunity". Reverse engineering, especially since we have the original creators on this list and they don't want to try it, seems like a long way to get to a short answer. Just my 2 cents. ___________________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe send a mail message with a SUBJECT line of "unsubscribe" to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
