On 26 September 2011 19:29, Chris Radek <ch...@timeguy.com> wrote: >> Does anyone know why the current return passes are offset by the cut depth? > > See 0f38a96f. This is a lot more tricky than it seems at first. You > can't change the length of entry moves and expect that you'll still > line up with the previous pass.
That seems odd, as the wait-for-synch is at the end of the move in question? > It's even a bit risky to change the length of the exit moves, because > you'll get a different velocity profile. Bacause it is trying to stop in a shorter distance? I think that the change ends up working in our favour, though, as the exit moves get longer for deeper cuts rather than shorter? I am not sure what tests one could do to check this. Or, rather, I can think of tests but not how you would analyse the results. -- atp "Torque wrenches are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
