On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:52:39 -0400, Eric Keller wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Lee Studley > <indigoreds...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> I personally feel its sad to make licensing so complex in an open >> source or GPL type >> environment. It impedes the flow free associative sharing of ideas ( >> Oppenheimer-endorsed ). >> > I agree. The militant license fanatics are trying to make a point > that I > don't think really needs to be made. "you can use my code which I > give > away freely, but only if you are as pure as me." Unfortunately, this > crap > starts at the top. The GPL started because they wanted open code. > With > linuxCNC, we have open code, but it's not pure enough. That's pure > horse > hockey in my view. Public domain is better, I think. This is about > the > 4th time this issue has come up on this project. I don't suppose it > really > has slowed anything down, but it's an annoyance.
Would you prefer we discuss other licenses such as MIT, BSD, CC? EBo -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
