On 3/3/2013 12:44 PM, Dan Falck wrote: > Michael Haberler has guided me through installing xenomai on a computer I > have here and I wanted to post my results from the latency-test. > > Intel Desktop Board D94GCLF2D (purchased from Newegg several years ago). > >
Dan: I also have this Intel board (Atom 330-based) and a later ASUS AT5NM10-I (Atom D510-based). I fell by the wayside a while back in my Xenomai testing and never got past my Intel P4 and AMD Athlon II cpus. Now that you've posted your Atom numbers, I feel inspired to catch up. We'll see if I can replicate your results. It seems to me things are stabilizing to the point where the Xenomai builds need no longer be considered experimental. IMHO, we should consider posting Xenomai metrics to the Wiki for easier comparison. I believe we should create a second Latency Test Results table (and label the two tables appropriately) rather than mix and match RTAI and Xenomai results within a single table, but that's just me. If no one has set it up by the time I get my boards set up (Note to self: get a bigger desk) and run the tests, I'll create the new table myself. Regards, Kent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
