On May 17 2013 11:45 AM, Kent A. Reed wrote: > On 5/17/2013 12:51 PM, EBo wrote: >> On May 17 2013 10:47 AM, andy pugh wrote: >>> On 17 May 2013 17:27, Kent A. Reed <kentallanr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> If a relational database approach isn't acceptable, how about an >>>> object-oriented database approach instead? >>> Why wouldn't it be? >>> >>> Snooping around the source tree last night I found: >>> >>> >>> http://git.linuxcnc.org/gitweb?p=linuxcnc.git;a=blob;f=src/emc/toolstore/sql/schema-simple.sql;h=21c04238eb6e7ae917a8049cc3555337fb0aeb1b;hb=HEAD >> to maybe state it a different way, is a relational database approach >> the best design model? Are there other design (like object >> oriented) >> from which we can leverage utility? >> > > Thanks, EBo, that's what I intended to say. I've been away from this > kind of work long enough to have forgotten to be explicit about > information modeling vs information-system implementation.
we are all good. Glad to have said something useful and not to humorous ;-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ AlienVault Unified Security Management (USM) platform delivers complete security visibility with the essential security capabilities. Easily and efficiently configure, manage, and operate all of your security controls from a single console and one unified framework. Download a free trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/alienvault_d2d _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
