On 01/05/2014 05:46 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 5 January 2014 02:31, Chris Morley <chrisinnana...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> - 1) Someone volunteers to follow up patch submissions.
> 
> Whilst this would be a good solution, I don't know if anyone has the
> breadth of knowledge of all facets of LinuxCNC to perform the role.
> Then there is the question of it that person exists whether they would
> want to take on such an open-ended commitment.

I think Chris means someone to communicate with the submitter and
shepherd the submitted patch to *someone else* who'd evaluate it.  So a
huge breadth of knowledge of linuxcnc internals wouldn't be needed,
"merely" good communication skills.

Tangentially, i think none of us knows all apects of linuxcnc internals.
 I know I don't...  Some of us know one part or two, some know another.
 Often evaluating patches would mean learning a new part of linuxcnc
internals.


-- 
Sebastian Kuzminsky

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to