On Sunday 04 December 2016 11:19:04 Filipe Tomaz wrote:

> In my lathe(s) I have VDI tooling.
>     Each tool settles only on its holder, and each tool is numbered.
> So I will always use the same tool without changing offsets or angles.
> Each time I need a new tool, I buy a new holder (VDI) so that my tool
> library gets larger. This is expensive but is very effective at the
> long run, due to time AND to avoid tool collisions. I even do this for
> drilling where I keep each commun drill in each holder.
>     Bottom rule is that a lathe collision is very nasty and make you
> think: "Why didn't I use the manual one ..."
>
I do not have a manual one. Everything I have is either run by gcode, or 
from the arrow keys on a keyboard.

>     By the way, I sell toolholders :-)

So there IS a method to the promotion. ;-)  OTOH the reasoning makes 
perfect sense.

No complaints from this old man, other than the cost of the toolholders, 
and a sensible storage scheme, all of which has to come out of my SS at 
some point.

>     Citando Gene Heskett <ghesk...@shentel.net>:
> > On Sunday 04 December 2016 08:36:35 Filipe Tomaz wrote:
> >> Ok, but still it would be good that the machine could make the
> >>    "possible" part, skipping without damage the part and the tool.
> >>        On a later tool, the final toolpath could be reached if the
> >> tool allows, and the user could in fact use the same programmed
> >> tool path.
> >>
> >>        This is my opinion.
> >>
> >>        Citando andy pugh <bodge...@gmail.com>:
> >>    On 4 December 2016 at 11:35, Filipe Tomaz
> >>    <filipeto...@portugalmail.pt> wrote:  > With this information
> >>
> >>        is possible to "know" the points on the toolpath where the
> >> tool can ACTUALLY REACH without damaging both the tool and the work
> >> part. This would provide a large improvement even over standard
> >> industrial controllers.
> >>
> >>       We already have a warning about this.
> >
> >   I think thats a good idea, great in fact. My problem is that of
> > putting the tool angle at the best compromise for my instant job,
> > usually by eye, driving the tool to various locations to see if this
> > angle can do it, and not telling the tooltable because I've no quick
> > and accurate enough device to measure the angle. The pro's here
> > probably do know how or have a measuring tool. I believe thats
> > largely my fault because I believe the tool table can now accept the
> > left and right angles of the face of the tool, plus the tip radii if
> > its known. But looking all that up, if indeed it's even published
> > for every tool in the drawer, is a right PITA.
> >
> >   How successful we are depends on our ability to be able to type
> > the 4 or 5 character chip style itself into a slot in the tool
> > table, and the angle of the lengthwise axis of the tool holder, and
> > let the tooltable code do the lookups to control all of that. 
> > Leaving a single variable up to a SWAG by me is an invite for a
> > disaster.
> >
> >   I would offer the guess that the uptake of such an idea in the
> > onsies to tensies shops would be considerably higher if a one time
> > tooltable entry really could cover a single tool holder that well. 
> > It sure would promote the tool holder sales for our quick change
> > posts. :)
> >
> >   G71-72 and this raspi.driver I'm trying to crash and haven't in
> > 2.8 final, the tool table might be LinuxCNC-3.0 stuff maybe?
> >
> >   My $0.02, probably ignoreable. Got to get me ready to go to a
> >   musical/dinner.
> >
> >   Cheers, Gene Heskett
> >   --
> >   "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
> >   soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
> >   -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
> >   Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >---------- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's
> > most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> > _______________________________________________
> >   Emc-developers mailing list
> > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/li
> >sts/listinfo/emc-developers
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>-------- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's
> most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-developers mailing list
> Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers


Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to